Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35052755›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2021

Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR)-A Useful Tool for the Prognosis of Sepsis in the ICU.

Alice Nicoleta Drăgoescu, Vlad Pădureanu, Andreea Doriana Stănculescu, Luminița Cristina Chiuțu, Paul Tomescu, Cristiana Geormăneanu, Rodica Pădureanu, Vlad Florin Iovănescu, Bogdan Silviu Ungureanu, Andrei Pănuș and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alice Nicoleta DrăgoescuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Vlad PădureanuDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-7398-5689
Andreea Doriana StănculescuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Luminița Cristina ChiuțuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Paul TomescuDepartment of Urology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Cristiana GeormăneanuDepartment of Emergency Medicine and First Aid, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Rodica PădureanuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Emergency Clinical County Hospital of Craiova, 200642 Craiova, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-3095-736X
Vlad Florin IovănescuDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Bogdan Silviu UngureanuDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-1984-791X
Andrei PănușDepartment of Urology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Octavian Petru DrăgoescuDepartment of Urology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is a life-threatening medical emergency induced by the body's extreme response to an infection. Despite well-defined and constantly updated criteria for diagnosing sepsis, it is still underdiagnosed worldwide. Among various markers studied over time, the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) recently emerged as a good marker to predict sepsis severity. Our study was a single-center prospective observational study performed in our ICU and included 114 patients admitted for sepsis or septic shock. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is easy to perform, CBC being one of the standard blood tests routinely performed upon admission for all ICU patients. We found that NLR was increased in all patients with sepsis and significantly raised in those with septic shock. NLR correlates significantly with sepsis severity evaluated by the SOFA score (R = 0.65) and also with extensively studied sepsis prognosis marker presepsin (R = 0.56). Additionally, NLR showed good sensitivity (47%) and specificity (78%) with AUC = 0.631 (

Indexed as

neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR)presepsinsepsisseptic shock

Identifiers

PMID35052755
PMCPMC8772781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.