Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35052461›Full record

ReviewGenes2022

Predicting Physical Appearance from DNA Data-Towards Genomic Solutions.

Ewelina Pośpiech, Paweł Teisseyre, Jan Mielniczuk, Wojciech Branicki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ewelina PośpiechMalopolska Centre of Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, 30-387 Kraków, Poland.
Paweł TeisseyreInstitute of Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences, 01-248 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4296-9819
Jan MielniczukInstitute of Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences, 01-248 Warsaw, Poland.
Wojciech BranickiMalopolska Centre of Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, 30-387 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7412-5733

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The idea of forensic DNA intelligence is to extract from genomic data any information that can help guide the investigation. The clues to the externally visible phenotype are of particular practical importance. The high heritability of the physical phenotype suggests that genetic data can be easily predicted, but this has only become possible with less polygenic traits. The forensic community has developed DNA-based predictive tools by employing a limited number of the most important markers analysed with targeted massive parallel sequencing. The complexity of the genetics of many other appearance phenotypes requires big data coupled with sophisticated machine learning methods to develop accurate genomic predictors. A significant challenge in developing universal genomic predictive methods will be the collection of sufficiently large data sets. These should be created using whole-genome sequencing technology to enable the identification of rare DNA variants implicated in phenotype determination. It is worth noting that the correctness of the forensic sketch generated from the DNA data depends on the inclusion of an age factor. This, however, can be predicted by analysing epigenetic data. An important limitation preventing whole-genome approaches from being commonly used in forensics is the slow progress in the development and implementation of high-throughput, low DNA input sequencing technologies. The example of palaeoanthropology suggests that such methods may possibly be developed in forensics.

Indexed as

Physical Appearance, BodyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideDNAForensic GeneticsGenomicsHumansSequence Analysis, DNADNADNA-based predictionforensic DNA intelligenceforensic genomicshuman genome variationinvestigative leadsphysical appearance

Identifiers

PMID35052461
PMCPMC8774670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.