ReviewGenes2021
Missing
Review in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Association and Prognostic Implications of Long Non-Coding RNAs in Major Psychiatric Disorders, Alzheimer's Diseases and Parkinson's Diseases: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Pooled it
- Non-coding RNA-mediated gene regulation in Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis: molecular insights and emerging innovations.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2025Review
- The Role of Non-Coding RNAs in Mitochondrial Dysfunction of Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2024Review
- Exploring the Frontier: Antisense Long Non-Coding RNAs as Key Regulators in Alzheimer's Disease.Aging and disease · 2024Review
- Genome-wide association studies identify novel loci in rapidly progressive Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the ongoing demographic shift towards increasingly elderly populations, it is estimated that approximately 150 million people will live with Alzheimer's disease (AD) by 2050. By then, AD will be one of the most burdensome diseases of this and potentially next centuries. Although its exact etiology remains elusive, both environmental and genetic factors play crucial roles in the mechanisms underlying AD neuropathology. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) identified genetic variants associated with AD susceptibility in more than 40 different genomic loci. Most of these disease-associated variants reside in non-coding regions of the genome. In recent years, it has become clear that functionally active transcripts arise from these non-coding loci. One type of non-coding transcript, referred to as long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), gained significant attention due to their multiple roles in neurodevelopment, brain homeostasis, aging, and their dysregulation or dysfunction in neurological diseases including in AD. Here, we will summarize the current knowledge regarding genetic variations, expression profiles, as well as potential functions, diagnostic or therapeutic roles of lncRNAs in AD. We postulate that lncRNAs may represent the missing link in AD pathology and that unraveling their role may open avenues to better AD treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.