Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35052210›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Role-Play versus Standardised Patient Simulation for Teaching Interprofessional Communication in Care of the Elderly for Nursing Students.

Alda Elena Cortés-Rodríguez, Pablo Roman, María Mar López-Rodríguez, Isabel María Fernández-Medina, Cayetano Fernández-Sola, José Manuel Hernández-Padilla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Community-engaged training in informed consent.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alda Elena Cortés-RodríguezDepartment of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3625-7321
Pablo RomanDepartment of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5966-0498
María Mar López-RodríguezDepartment of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8810-520X
Isabel María Fernández-MedinaDepartment of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0805-1542
Cayetano Fernández-SolaDepartment of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1721-0947
José Manuel Hernández-PadillaDepartment of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5032-9440

Funding

Health Sciences Research Group & Centre for Healthcare Research (CEINSA), University of Almería CTS-451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to describe and compare the effects of standardised patient simulation and role-play in the acquisition and retention of interprofessional communication in elderly care competence amongst nursing students. In this controlled clustered randomised trial, 121 nursing students attended a workshop on interprofessional communication in elderly care using role-play or standardised patient simulation. The study was conducted between September 2017 and February 2018. Participants' knowledge, self-efficacy and communication skills were assessed using a simulated scenario at pre-test, post-test and 6-week follow-up points. Between-subject and within-subject differences were measured using counts and proportions of participants who achieved competence. Regardless of the strategy applied, a significant improvement in knowledge, skills, self-efficacy and overall interprofessional communication competence was found between pre-test and post-test. Moreover, there were significant differences between pre-test and follow-up for all the studied variables, but no differences were found between post-test and follow-up. Lastly, when comparing the success rates of both strategies, no significant differences were observed (

Indexed as

interprofessional communicationnursingrole-playsimulationstandardised patient

Identifiers

PMID35052210
PMCPMC8775804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.