Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35052128›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Permutation Entropy-Based Interpretability of Convolutional Neural Network Models for Interictal EEG Discrimination of Subjects with Epileptic Seizures vs. Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizures.

Michele Lo Giudice, Giuseppe Varone, Cosimo Ieracitano, Nadia Mammone, Giovanbattista Gaspare Tripodi, Edoardo Ferlazzo, Sara Gasparini, Umberto Aguglia, Francesco Carlo Morabito

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michele Lo GiudiceDepartment of Science Medical and Surgery, University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2660-0405
Giuseppe VaroneDepartment of Neuroscience & Imaging, University G. d'Annunzio Chieti e Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3616-6032
Cosimo IeracitanoDICEAM Department, University "Mediterranea" of Reggio Calabria, 89100 Reggio Calabria, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7890-2897
Nadia MammoneDICEAM Department, University "Mediterranea" of Reggio Calabria, 89100 Reggio Calabria, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4962-3500
Giovanbattista Gaspare TripodiRegional Epilepsy Center, Great Metropolitan Hospital "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli" of Reggio Calabria, 89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Edoardo FerlazzoDepartment of Science Medical and Surgery, University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Sara GaspariniDepartment of Science Medical and Surgery, University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Umberto AgugliaDepartment of Science Medical and Surgery, University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4574-2951
Francesco Carlo MorabitoDICEAM Department, University "Mediterranea" of Reggio Calabria, 89100 Reggio Calabria, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0734-9136
Magna Graecia University · ITUniversity of Reggio Calabria · ITAzienda ospedaliera "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli" · ITUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The differential diagnosis of epileptic seizures (ES) and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) may be difficult, due to the lack of distinctive clinical features. The interictal electroencephalographic (EEG) signal may also be normal in patients with ES. Innovative diagnostic tools that exploit non-linear EEG analysis and deep learning (DL) could provide important support to physicians for clinical diagnosis. In this work, 18 patients with new-onset ES (12 males, 6 females) and 18 patients with video-recorded PNES (2 males, 16 females) with normal interictal EEG at visual inspection were enrolled. None of them was taking psychotropic drugs. A convolutional neural network (CNN) scheme using DL classification was designed to classify the two categories of subjects (ES vs. PNES). The proposed architecture performs an EEG time-frequency transformation and a classification step with a CNN. The CNN was able to classify the EEG recordings of subjects with ES vs. subjects with PNES with 94.4% accuracy. CNN provided high performance in the assigned binary classification when compared to standard learning algorithms (multi-layer perceptron, support vector machine, linear discriminant analysis and quadratic discriminant analysis). In order to interpret how the CNN achieved this performance, information theoretical analysis was carried out. Specifically, the permutation entropy (PE) of the feature maps was evaluated and compared in the two classes. The achieved results, although preliminary, encourage the use of these innovative techniques to support neurologists in early diagnoses.

Indexed as

convolutional neural networkdeep learningEEGepilepsyinterpretabilitymachine learningpermutation entropyPNESwavelet

Identifiers

PMID35052128
PMCPMC8775069
OpenAlexW4206477528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.