ArticleBlood advances2022
Reduced intensity hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for accelerated-phase myelofibrosis.
Article in Blood advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating novel therapeutic strategies in myeloproliferative neoplasms: Driving disease-directed progress.British journal of haematology · 2026Review
- Impact of High-Risk Mutations and Treatment Intensity in Accelerated-Phase Blast-Phase MPN Without Adverse-Risk Karyotype and TP53.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Outcomes of allogeneic transplantation in blast-phase myeloproliferative neoplasms: one-third achieve long-term survival.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Article
- Article
- Prevention and treatment of transformation of myeloproliferative neoplasms to acute myeloid leukemia.Haematologica · 2025Review
- Myelofibrosis: Timing of Transplantation and Management of Splenomegaly.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025Review
- CAR T-cell toxicities: from bedside to bench, how novel toxicities inform laboratory investigations.Blood advances · 2024Review
- Treatment approach and outcomes of patients with accelerated/blast-phase myeloproliferative neoplasms in the current era.Blood advances · 2024Article
- Graft-versus-host disease and impact on relapse in myelofibrosis undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Bone marrow transplantation · 2024Article
- Proinflammatory phenotype of iPS cell-derived JAK2 V617F megakaryocytes induces fibrosis in 3D in vitro bone marrow niche.Stem cell reports · 2024Article
- Immunotherapy in hematologic malignancies: achievements, challenges and future prospects.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023Review
- Blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasm: contemporary review and 2024 treatment algorithm.Blood cancer journal · 2023Review
- Improving allogeneic stem cell transplantation in myelofibrosis.International journal of hematology · 2022Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accelerated-phase myelofibrosis, currently defined by circulating blasts 10% to 19%, usually confers very high risk for progression and poor outcome. The outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for accelerated-phase myelofibrosis has not been evaluated yet. We analyzed the outcome of 349 clinically and genetically annotated patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis undergoing reduced intensity transplantation, of whom 35 had accelerated-phase myelofibrosis. In comparison with chronic-phase (<10% blasts) myelofibrosis, median leukocyte counts were higher, more patients had constitutional symptoms, and RAS mutations were detected more frequently in the accelerated-phase group. After a median follow-up of 5.9 years, estimated 5-year overall survival was 65% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49% to 81%) vs 64% (95% CI, 59% to 69%) for the chronic-phase group (P = .91), and median overall survival was not reached. In terms of relapse-free survival, estimated 5-year outcome for the accelerated-phase group was 49% (95% CI, 32% to 67%) vs 55% (95% CI, 50% to 61%) for the chronic-phase group (P = .65). Estimated 5-year nonrelapse mortality was 20% (95% CI, 8% to 33%) for the accelerated-phase group vs 30% (95% CI, 24% to 35%; P = .25) for the chronic-phase group. In terms of relapse, 5-year incidence was 30% (95% CI, 14% to 46%) for the accelerated-phase group vs 15% (95% CI, 11% to 19%) for the chronic-phase group (P = .02). Results were confirmed in multivariable analysis and propensity score matching. In conclusion, reduced intensity transplantation showed excellent survival but higher relapse for accelerated-phase myelofibrosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.