Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35051949›Full record

Trial reportPsychotherapy and psychosomatics2022

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program versus Crisis Counseling in Preventing Repeat Suicide Attempts: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study.

Petri Arvilommi, Jukka Valkonen, Lars H Lindholm, Selma Gaily-Luoma, Kirsi Suominen, Outi M Ruishalme, Marena Kukkonen, Harri Sihvola, Erkki Isometsä

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychotherapy and psychosomatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Brief and Ultra-Brief Suicide-Specific Interventions.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Petri ArvilommiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Jukka ValkonenMIELI Mental Health Finland, Helsinki, Finland.
Lars H LindholmDepartment of Psychiatry, South Ostrobothnia Hospital District, Seinäjoki, Finland.
Selma Gaily-LuomaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Kirsi SuominenHelsinki City Department of Social Services and Healthcare, Psychiatric and Substance Abuse Services, Helsinki, Finland.
Outi M RuishalmeMIELI Mental Health Finland, Helsinki, Finland.
Marena KukkonenMIELI Mental Health Finland, Helsinki, Finland.
Harri SihvolaMIELI Mental Health Finland, Helsinki, Finland.
Erkki IsometsäDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
University of Helsinki · FITampere University · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program (ASSIP) is a brief psychotherapeutic intervention, and a pivotal study found it to be remarkably effective in reducing repeat suicide attempts.

objectiveTo compare the effectiveness of ASSIP to crisis counseling (CC) in a randomized clinical trial (ISRCTN13464512).

methodsAdult patients receiving treatment for a suicide attempt in a Helsinki City general hospital emergency room in 2016-2017 were eligible to participate. We excluded psychotic or likely non-adherent substance-abusing or substance-dependent patients. Eligible patients (n = 239) were randomly allocated to one of two interventions. (a) ASSIP comprised three visits, including a videotaped first visit, a case formulation, and an individualized safety plan, plus letters from the therapist every 3 months for 1 year, and then, every 6 months for the next year. (b) CC typically involved 2-5 (median 3) face-to-face individual sessions. In addition, all participants received their usual treatment. One and 2 years after baseline, information related to participants' suicidal thoughts and attempts, and psychiatric treatment received was collected via telephone and from medical and psychiatric records.

resultsAmong randomized patients, two-thirds initiated either ASSIP (n = 89) or CC (n = 72), with 73 (82%) completing ASSIP and 58 (81%) CC. The proportion of patients who attempted suicide during the 2-year follow-up did not differ significantly between ASSIP and CC (29.2% [26/89] vs. 35.2% [25/71], OR 0.755 [95% Cl 0.379-1.504]).

conclusionsWe found no difference in the effectiveness of the two brief interventions to prevent repeat suicide attempts.

Indexed as

Crisis InterventionSuicide, AttemptedAdultCounselingFollow-Up StudiesHumansSuicidal IdeationASSIPEffectivenessRandomized controlled trialSuicide attempt

Identifiers

PMID35051949
PMCPMC9153344
OpenAlexW4205220276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.