Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35051744›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2022

Automatic segmentation of white matter hyperintensities: validation and comparison with state-of-the-art methods on both Multiple Sclerosis and elderly subjects.

Philippe Tran, Urielle Thoprakarn, Emmanuelle Gourieux, Clarisse Longo Dos Santos, Enrica Cavedo, Nicolas Guizard, François Cotton, Pierre Krolak-Salmon, Christine Delmaire, Damien Heidelberg and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cerebral small vessel disease lesion segmentation methods: A systematic review.Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Philippe TranQynapse, Paris, France; Equipe-projet ARAMIS, ICM, CNRS UMR 7225, Inserm U1117, Sorbonne Université UMR_S 1127, Centre Inria de Paris, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière Charles Foix, Faculté de Médecine Sorbonne Université, Paris, France. Electronic address: ptran@qynapse.com.
Urielle ThoprakarnQynapse, Paris, France.
Emmanuelle GourieuxCATI, ICM, CNRS UMR 7225, Inserm U1117, Sorbonne Université UMR_S 1127, Paris, France; NeuroSpin, CEA, Saclay, France.
Clarisse Longo Dos SantosQynapse, Paris, France.
Enrica CavedoQynapse, Paris, France.
Nicolas GuizardQynapse, Paris, France.
François CottonService de Radiologie, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France; Univ Lyon, INSA-Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UJM-Saint Etienne, CNRS, Inserm, CREATIS UMR 5220, U1206, F-69495, Pierre-Bénite, France.
Pierre Krolak-SalmonUniv Lyon, INSA-Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UJM-Saint Etienne, CNRS, Inserm, CREATIS UMR 5220, U1206, F-69495, Pierre-Bénite, France; Clinical and Research Memory Centre of Lyon, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; INSERM, U1028, UMR CNRS 5292, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, Lyon, France.
Christine DelmaireFondation Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France.
Damien HeidelbergService de Radiologie, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France.
Nadya PyatigorskayaDepartment of Neuroradiology, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université UMR_S 1127, Paris, France.
Sébastian StröerDepartment of Neuroradiology, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université UMR_S 1127, Paris, France.
Didier DormontEquipe-projet ARAMIS, ICM, CNRS UMR 7225, Inserm U1117, Sorbonne Université UMR_S 1127, Centre Inria de Paris, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière Charles Foix, Faculté de Médecine Sorbonne Université, Paris, France; Department of Neuroradiology, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université UMR_S 1127, Paris, France.
Jean-Baptiste MartiniQynapse, Paris, France.
Marie ChupinCATI, ICM, CNRS UMR 7225, Inserm U1117, Sorbonne Université UMR_S 1127, Paris, France.
Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiatives, for the Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Neuroimaging Initiative

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
The Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Neuroimaging InitiativeR01AG032306 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ROSEN, HOWARD J · 2009 to 2013
$10.0M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG032306NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different types of white matter hyperintensities (WMH) can be observed through MRI in the brain and spinal cord, especially Multiple Sclerosis (MS) lesions for patients suffering from MS and age-related WMH for subjects with cognitive disorders and/or elderly people. To better diagnose and monitor the disease progression, the quantitative evaluation of WMH load has proven to be useful for clinical routine and trials. Since manual delineation for WMH segmentation is highly time-consuming and suffers from intra and inter observer variability, several methods have been proposed to automatically segment either MS lesions or age-related WMH, but none is validated on both WMH types. Here, we aim at proposing the White matter Hyperintensities Automatic Segmentation Algorithm adapted to 3D T2-FLAIR datasets (WHASA-3D), a fast and robust automatic segmentation tool designed to be implemented in clinical practice for the detection of both MS lesions and age-related WMH in the brain, using both 3D T1-weighted and T2-FLAIR images. In order to increase its robustness for MS lesions, WHASA-3D expands the original WHASA method, which relies on the coupling of non-linear diffusion framework and watershed parcellation, where regions considered as WMH are selected based on intensity and location characteristics, and finally refined with geodesic dilation. The previous validation was performed on 2D T2-FLAIR and subjects with cognitive disorders and elderly subjects. 60 subjects from a heterogeneous database of dementia patients, multiple sclerosis patients and elderly subjects with multiple MRI scanners and a wide range of lesion loads were used to evaluate WHASA and WHASA-3D through volume and spatial agreement in comparison with consensus reference segmentations. In addition, a direct comparison on the MS database with six available supervised and unsupervised state-of-the-art WMH segmentation methods (LST-LGA and LPA, Lesion-TOADS, lesionBrain, BIANCA and nicMSlesions) with default and optimised settings (when feasible) was conducted. WHASA-3D confirmed an improved performance with respect to WHASA, achieving a better spatial overlap (Dice) (0.67 vs 0.63), a reduced absolute volume error (AVE) (3.11 vs 6.2 mL) and an increased volume agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC) (0.96 vs 0.78). Compared to available state-of-the-art algorithms on the MS database, WHASA-3D outperformed both unsupervised and supervised methods when used with their default settings, showing the highest volume agreement (ICC = 0.95) as well as the highest average Dice (0.58). Optimising and/or retraining LST-LGA, BIANCA and nicMSlesions, using a subset of the MS database as training set, resulted in improved performances on the remaining testing set (average Dice: LST-LGA default/optimized = 0.41/0.51, BIANCA default/optimized = 0.22/0.39, nicMSlesions default/optimized = 0.17/0.63, WHASA-3D = 0.58). Evaluation and comparison results suggest that WHASA-3D is a reliable and easy-to-use method for the automated segmentation of white matter hyperintensities, for both MS lesions and age-related WMH. Further validation on larger datasets would be useful to confirm these first findings.

Indexed as

LeukoaraiosisMultiple SclerosisWhite MatterAgedAlgorithmsBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging3D T2-FLAIRAge-related vascular disorderAutomatic segmentationMRIMultiple sclerosisWhite matter hyperintensities

Identifiers

PMID35051744
PMCPMC8896108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.