Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35051582›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2022

Divided attention at retrieval does not influence neural correlates of recollection in young or older adults.

Mingzhu Hou, Erin D Horne, Marianne de Chastelaine, Michael D Rugg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The effect of target detection on memory retrieval.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mingzhu HouCenter for Vital Longevity and School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, 1600 Viceroy Drive, Suite 800, Dallas, TX 75235, United States. Electronic address: mingzhu.hou@utdallas.edu.
Erin D HorneCenter for Vital Longevity and School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, 1600 Viceroy Drive, Suite 800, Dallas, TX 75235, United States; Center for BrainHealth and School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX 75235, United States.
Marianne de ChastelaineCenter for Vital Longevity and School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, 1600 Viceroy Drive, Suite 800, Dallas, TX 75235, United States.
Michael D RuggCenter for Vital Longevity and School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, 1600 Viceroy Drive, Suite 800, Dallas, TX 75235, United States; School of Psychology, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom.
The University of Texas at Dallas · USUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

Relationship Between Neural Correlates of Episodic Memory,Age, Memory PerformanceRF1AG039103 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI RUGG, MICHAEL D · 2017 to 2017
$2.7M
Effects of Age and Resource Depletion on Post-retrieval Monitoring and Individual Differences in Memory PerformanceR21AG054197 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI RUGG, MICHAEL D · 2016 to 2017
$421k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG054197NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG039103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age-related decline in episodic memory has been partially attributed to older adults' reduced domain general processing resources. In the present study, we examined the effects of divided attention (DA) - a manipulation assumed to further deplete the already limited processing resources of older adults - on the neural correlates of recollection in young and older adults. Participants underwent fMRI scanning while they performed an associative recognition test in single and dual (tone detection) task conditions. Recollection effects were operationalized as greater BOLD activity elicited by test pairs correctly endorsed as 'intact' than pairs correctly or incorrectly endorsed as 'rearranged'. Detrimental effects of DA on associative recognition performance were identified in older but not young adults. The magnitudes of recollection effects did not differ between the single and dual (tone detection) tasks in either age group. Across the task conditions, age-invariant recollection effects were evident in most members of the core recollection network. However, while young adults demonstrated robust recollection effects in left angular gyrus, angular gyrus effects were undetectable in the older adults in either task condition. With the possible exception of this result, the findings suggest that DA did not influence processes supporting the retrieval and representation of associative information in either young or older adults, and converge with prior behavioral findings to suggest that episodic retrieval operations are little affected by DA.

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicAdolescentAdultAgedAuditory PerceptionBrain MappingFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuropsychological TestsTexasAgingCore recollection networkDual taskEpisodic memoryfMRI

Identifiers

PMID35051582
PMCPMC8885896
OpenAlexW4206361559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.