'Rise of the Machines': Human Factors and training for robotic-assisted surgery.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Does training on robotic virtual reality simulators improve the post-training robotic surgical skills of surgeons? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of minimal access surgery · 2026
   Article
2. Biochemical implications of robotic surgery: a new frontier in the operating room.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024
   Review
3. Robotic docking time with the Hugo™ RAS system in gynecologic surgery: a procedure independent learning curve using the cumulative summation analysis (CUSUM).Journal of robotic surgery · 2023
   Article
4. Safe implementation of surgical innovation: a prospective registry of the Versius Robotic Surgical System.BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies · 2023
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as