Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35051212›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

The importance of active surveillance of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) in colonization rates in critically ill patients.

Mabel Duarte Alves Gomides, Astrídia Marília de Souza Fontes, Amanda Oliveira Soares Monteiro Silveira, Daniel Chadud Matoso, Anderson Luiz Ferreira, Geraldo Sadoyama

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Evaluation of XpertDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Epidemiology of Carbapenem-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mabel Duarte Alves GomidesAdult Intensive Care Unit, Uberlândia Clinical Hospital, Uberlândia, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1253-9428
Astrídia Marília de Souza FontesHospital Infection Control Sector, Uberlândia Clinical Hospital, Uberlândia, Brazil.
Amanda Oliveira Soares Monteiro SilveiraIBIOTEC (Institute of Biology and Technology), Federal University of Catalão, Catalão, Brazil.
Daniel Chadud MatosoAdult Intensive Care Unit, Uberlândia Clinical Hospital, Uberlândia, Brazil.
Anderson Luiz FerreiraIBIOTEC (Institute of Biology and Technology), Federal University of Catalão, Catalão, Brazil.
Geraldo SadoyamaIBIOTEC (Institute of Biology and Technology), Federal University of Catalão, Catalão, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Catalão · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to demonstrate the importance of active carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) surveillance and evaluate the prevalence of invasive infections, risk factors, and mortality risk in CRE-colonized patients.

methodsRetrospective cohort study analyzing 1,920 patients identified using an active CRE surveillance protocol, admitted to an adult intensive care unit in southeastern Brazil from January 2014 to December 2018.

resultsThere were 297 (15.47%) CRE colonized patients, with one colonized for every six control patients. CRE-colonized patients demonstrated an increased chance of infection (odds ratio [OR] 7.967, p < 0.001). Overall, 20.54% of the colonized patients presented invasive infection (81.96% due to Klebsiella pneumoniae). The colonization and infection ratio demonstrated the important role of the active CRE surveillance protocol. There were identified multiple risk factors for CRE colonization, including long-term mechanical ventilation (OR 1.624, p = 0.019) and previous exposure to aminopenicillins (OR 5.204, p < 0.001), carbapenems (OR 3.703, p = 0.017), cephalosporins (OR 12.036, p < 0.001), and fluoroquinolones (OR 5.238, p = 0.012). The mortality risk was significantly higher among colonized (OR 2.356, p < 0.001) and colonized-infected (OR 2.000, p = 0.009) patients and in those with Enterobacter cloacae colonization (OR 5.173, p < 0,001) and previous aminopenicillins exposure (OR 3.452, p = 0.007).

conclusionsEarly detection of CRE colonization through screening testing proved to be an important tool to control CRE spread. However, observation over the years has shown no effective control of colonization and infection. The prevalence rates of CRE colonization and colonization-infection were high, as were the mortality rates. In conclusion, an active CRE surveillance protocol is essential, but its impact depends on the effective implementation of preventive measures and feedback between team members.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenem-Resistant EnterobacteriaceaeCarbapenemsDrug Resistance, BacterialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenems

Identifiers

PMID35051212
PMCPMC8775193
OpenAlexW4206216653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.