Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35051180›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Oxygen provision to severely ill COVID-19 patients at the peak of the 2020 pandemic in a Swedish district hospital.

Anna Hvarfner, Ahmed Al-Djaber, Hampus Ekström, Malin Enarsson, Markus Castegren, Tim Baker, Carl Otto Schell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna HvarfnerCenter for Clinical Research Dalarna, Uppsala University, Falun, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1718-0007
Ahmed Al-DjaberCenter for Clinical Research Sörmland, Uppsala University, Eskilstuna, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7352-2852
Hampus EkströmCenter for Clinical Research Sörmland, Uppsala University, Eskilstuna, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1021-8308
Malin EnarssonCenter for Clinical Research Sörmland, Uppsala University, Eskilstuna, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3361-045X
Markus CastegrenCenter for Clinical Research Sörmland, Uppsala University, Eskilstuna, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9292-0298
Tim BakerDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8727-7018
Carl Otto SchellDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7904-1336

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oxygen is a low-cost and life-saving therapy for patients with COVID-19. Yet, it is a limited resource in many hospitals in low income countries and in the 2020 pandemic even hospitals in richer countries reported oxygen shortages. An accurate understanding of oxygen requirements is needed for capacity planning. The World Health Organization estimates the average flow-rate of oxygen to severe COVID-19-patients to be 10 l/min. However, there is a lack of empirical data about the oxygen provision to patients. This study aimed to estimate the oxygen provision to COVID-19 patients with severe disease in a Swedish district hospital. A retrospective, medical records-based cohort study was conducted in March to May 2020 in a Swedish district hospital. All adult patients with severe COVID-19 -those who received oxygen in the ward and had no ICU-admission during their hospital stay-were included. Data were collected on the oxygen flow-rates provided to the patients throughout their hospital stay, and summary measures of oxygen provision calculated. One-hundred and twenty-six patients were included, median age was 70 years and 43% were female. On admission, 27% had a peripheral oxygen saturation of ≤91% and 54% had a respiratory rate of ≥25/min. The mean oxygen flow-rate to patients while receiving oxygen therapy was 3.0 l/min (SD 2.9) and the mean total volume of oxygen provided per patient admission was 16,000 l (SD 23,000). In conclusion, the provision of oxygen to severely ill COVID-19-patients was lower than previously estimated. Further research is required before global estimates are adjusted.

Indexed as

Oxygen Inhalation TherapyAgedAged, 80 and overCOVID-19Critical CareDatabases, FactualFemaleHospitals, DistrictHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsRetrospective StudiesSwedenTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35051180
PMCPMC8775206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.