Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35051048›Full record

ArticleToxics2021

From Extrapolation to Precision Chemical Hazard Assessment: The Ecdysone Receptor Case Study.

Raquel Ruivo, João Sousa, Teresa Neuparth, Olivier Geffard, Arnaud Chaumot, L Filipe C Castro, Davide Degli-Esposti, Miguel M Santos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prioritising research on endocrine disruption in the marine environment: a global perspective.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. First characterization of the nuclear receptor superfamily in the Mediterranean musselPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Raquel RuivoCIIMAR/CIMAR-Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, 4450-208 Matosinhos, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2412-8730
João SousaCIIMAR/CIMAR-Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, 4450-208 Matosinhos, Portugal.
Teresa NeuparthCIIMAR/CIMAR-Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, 4450-208 Matosinhos, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3314-0184
Olivier GeffardEcotoxicology Team, INRAE-Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement, Unité de Recherche RiverLy, F-69625 Villeurbanne, France.
Arnaud ChaumotEcotoxicology Team, INRAE-Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement, Unité de Recherche RiverLy, F-69625 Villeurbanne, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9132-3419
L Filipe C CastroCIIMAR/CIMAR-Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, 4450-208 Matosinhos, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7697-386X
Davide Degli-EspostiEcotoxicology Team, INRAE-Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement, Unité de Recherche RiverLy, F-69625 Villeurbanne, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1390-4845
Miguel M SantosCIIMAR/CIMAR-Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, 4450-208 Matosinhos, Portugal.
Universidade do Porto · PTInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FR

Funding

French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety 2019/1/112
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hazard assessment strategies are often supported by extrapolation of damage probabilities, regarding chemical action and species susceptibilities. Yet, growing evidence suggests that an adequate sampling of physiological responses across a representative taxonomic scope is of paramount importance. This is particularly relevant for Nuclear Receptors (NR), a family of transcription factors, often triggered by ligands and thus, commonly exploited by environmental chemicals. Within NRs, the ligand-induced Ecdysone Receptor (EcR) provides a remarkable example. Long regarded as arthropod specific, this receptor has been extensively targeted by pesticides, seemingly innocuous to non-target organisms. Yet, current evidence clearly suggests a wider presence of EcR orthologues across metazoan lineages, with unknown physiological consequences. Here, we address the state-of-the-art regarding the phylogenetic distribution and functional characterization of metazoan EcRs and provide a critical analysis of the potential disruption of such EcRs by environmental chemical exposure. Using EcR as a case study, hazard assessment strategies are also discussed in view of the development of a novel "precision hazard assessment paradigm.

Indexed as

endocrine disruptionhazard assessmentinvertebratesnuclear receptors

Identifiers

PMID35051048
PMCPMC8778615
OpenAlexW4200614921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.