Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35050849›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

Automated annotation of birdsong with a neural network that segments spectrograms.

Yarden Cohen, David Aaron Nicholson, Alexa Sanchioni, Emily K Mallaber, Viktoriya Skidanova, Timothy J Gardner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Does Zipf's law of abbreviation shape birdsong?PLoS computational biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Recent Advances at the Interface of Neuroscience and Artificial Neural Networks.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yarden Cohen *Department of Brain Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-8149-6954
David Aaron Nicholson *Biology department, Emory University, Atlanta, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4261-4719
Alexa Sanchioni *Biology department, Boston University, Boston, United States.
Emily K Mallaber *Biology department, Boston University, Boston, United States.
Viktoriya Skidanova *Biology department, Boston University, Boston, United States.
Timothy J GardnerPhil and Penny Knight Campus for Accelerating Scientific Impact, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1744-3970

Funding

the self-tuning brain: cellular and circuit mechanisms of behavioral resilienceR01NS104925 · NINDS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI FAIRHALL, ADRIENNE L, GARDNER, TIMOTHY JAMES · 2017 to 2022
$5.4M
Corticostriatal contributions to motor exploration and reinforcementRF1NS118424 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GARDNER, TIMOTHY JAMES, LOIS, CARLOS · 2020 to 2020
$3.7M
Corticostriatal contributions to motor exploration and reinforcementR01NS118424 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GARDNER, TIMOTHY JAMES, LOIS, CARLOS · 2023 to 2024
$2.3M
A platform for innovation in miniature microscopyR24NS098536 · NINDS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI DAVISON, IAN GORDON, GARDNER, TIMOTHY JAMES · 2016 to 2019
$1.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS104925NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS118424NINDS NIH HHS R24 NS098536NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS118424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Songbirds provide a powerful model system for studying sensory-motor learning. However, many analyses of birdsong require time-consuming, manual annotation of its elements, called syllables. Automated methods for annotation have been proposed, but these methods assume that audio can be cleanly segmented into syllables, or they require carefully tuning multiple statistical models. Here, we present TweetyNet: a single neural network model that learns how to segment spectrograms of birdsong into annotated syllables. We show that TweetyNet mitigates limitations of methods that rely on segmented audio. We also show that TweetyNet performs well across multiple individuals from two species of songbirds, Bengalese finches and canaries. Lastly, we demonstrate that using TweetyNet we can accurately annotate very large datasets containing multiple days of song, and that these predicted annotations replicate key findings from behavioral studies. In addition, we provide open-source software to assist other researchers, and a large dataset of annotated canary song that can serve as a benchmark. We conclude that TweetyNet makes it possible to address a wide range of new questions about birdsong.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerVocalization, AnimalAnimalsFinchesModels, Biologicalautomated annotationbengalese finchescanariesmachine learning algorithmsneural networkneurosciencesongbirdssong syntaxsound event detection

Identifiers

PMID35050849
PMCPMC8860439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.