Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35050817›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of sports medicine2022

Predictors of Graft Failure in Young Active Patients Undergoing Hamstring Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With or Without a Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis: The Stability Experience.

Andrew D Firth, Dianne M Bryant, Robert Litchfield, Robert G McCormack, Mark Heard, Peter B MacDonald, Tim Spalding, Peter C M Verdonk, Devin Peterson, Davide Bardana and 64 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of sports medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
24.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

74 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew D Firth
Dianne M Bryant
Robert LitchfieldLondon Health Sciences Centre, Western University, Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, London, Canada.
Robert G McCormackFraser Orthopaedic Institute, New Westminster, Canada.
Mark HeardBanff Sport Medicine, Banff, Canada.
Peter B MacDonaldPan Am Clinic, Winnipeg, Canada.
Tim SpaldingUniversity Hospitals Coventry Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Peter C M VerdonkAntwerp Orthopaedic Center, Ghent, Belgium.
Devin PetersonMcMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Davide BardanaQueens University, Kingston, Canada.
Alex RezansoffSport Medicine Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
STABILITY Study Group
Alan M J Getgood
Kevin Willits
Trevor Birmingham
Chris Hewison
Stacey Wanlin
Ryan Pinto
Ashley Martindale
Lindsey O'Neill
Morgan Jennings
Michal DanilukLondon Health Sciences Centre, Western University, Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, London, Canada.
Dory Boyer
Mauri Zomar
Karyn Moon
Raely Moon
Brenda Fan
Bindu MohanFraser Orthopaedic Institute, New Westminster, Canada.
Gregory M Buchko
Laurie A Hiemstra
Sarah Kerslake
Jeremy TynedalBanff Sport Medicine, Banff, Canada.
Greg Stranges
Sheila Mcrae
LeeAnne Gullett
Holly Brown
Alexandra Legary
Alison Longo
Mat Christian
Celeste FergusonPan Am Clinic, Winnipeg, Canada.
Nick Mohtadi
Rhamona Barber
Denise Chan
Caitlin Campbell
Alexandra Garven
Karen Pulsifer
Michelle MayerSport Medicine Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Nicole Simunovic
Andrew Duong
David Robinson
David Levy
Matt Skelly
Ajaykumar ShanmugarajMcMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Fiona Howells
Murray ToughQueens University, Kingston, Canada.
Pete Thompson
Andrew Metcalfe
Laura Asplin
Alisen Dube
Louise Clarkson
Jaclyn Brown
Alison Bolsover
Carolyn Bradshaw
Larissa Belgrove
Francis Milan
Sylvia Turner
Sarah Verdugo
Janet Lowe
Debra Dunne
Kerri McGowan
Charlie-Marie SuddensUniversity Hospitals Coventry Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Geert Declerq
Kristien Vuylsteke
Mieke Van HaverAntwerp Orthopaedic Center, Ghent, Belgium.
Western University · CABanff Centre · CAMcMaster University · CAPan Am Clinic · CAQueen's University · CAUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) has higher failure rates in young active patients returning to sports as compared with older, less active individuals. Augmentation of ACLR with an anterolateral procedure has been shown to reduce failure rates; however, indications for this procedure have yet to be clearly defined. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of ACL graft failure in high-risk patients and determine key indications for when hamstring ACLR should be augmented by a lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET). We hypothesized that different preoperative characteristics and surgical variables may be associated with graft failure characterized by asymmetric pivot shift and graft rupture. STUDY

designCase-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

methodsData were obtained from the Stability 1 Study, a multicenter randomized controlled trial of young active patients undergoing autologous hamstring ACLR with or without a LET. We performed 2 multivariable logistic regression analyses, with asymmetric pivot shift and graft rupture as the dependent variables. The following were included as predictors: LET, age, sex, graft diameter, tear chronicity, preoperative high-grade knee laxity, preoperative hyperextension on the contralateral side, medial meniscal repair/excision, lateral meniscal repair/excision, posterior tibial slope angle, and return-to-sports exposure time and level.

resultsOf the 618 patients in the Stability 1 Study, 568 with a mean age of 18.8 years (292 female; 51.4%) were included in this analysis. Asymmetric pivot shift occurred in 152 (26.8%) and graft rupture in 43 (7.6%). The addition of a LET (odds ratio [OR], 0.56; 95% CI, 0.37-0.83) and increased graft diameter (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44-0.87) were significantly associated with lower odds of asymmetric pivot shift. The addition of a LET (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.18-0.91) and older age (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.72-0.96) significantly reduced the odds of graft rupture, while greater tibial slope (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.01-1.32), preoperative high-grade knee laxity (OR, 3.27; 95% CI, 1.45-7.41), and greater exposure time to sport (ie, earlier return to sport) (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.08-1.29) were significantly associated with greater odds of rupture.

conclusionThe addition of a LET and larger graft diameter were significantly associated with reduced odds of asymmetric pivot shift. Adding a LET was protective of graft rupture, while younger age, greater posterior tibial slope, high-grade knee laxity, and earlier return to sport were associated with increased odds of graft rupture. Orthopaedic surgeons should consider supplementing hamstring autograft ACLR with a LET in young active patients with morphological characteristics that make them at high risk of reinjury.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionTenodesisAdolescentAutograftsCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansKnee JointACLR failureanterior cruciate ligament reconstructionlateral extra-articular tenodesispredictors

Identifiers

PMID35050817
PMCPMC8829733
OpenAlexW4205343310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.