Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35050773›Full record

ArticleJCO precision oncology2020

Clinical Pan-Cancer Assessment of Mismatch Repair Deficiency Using Tumor-Only, Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing.

Adem Albayrak, Ana C Garrido-Castro, Marios Giannakis, Renato Umeton, Monica Devi Manam, Elizabeth H Stover, Rebecca L Porter, Bruce E Johnson, Kai-Li Liaw, Mayur Amonkar and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO precision oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Adem AlbayrakInformatics and Analytics Department, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Ana C Garrido-CastroDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Marios GiannakisDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Renato UmetonInformatics and Analytics Department, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Monica Devi ManamDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Elizabeth H StoverDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Rebecca L PorterDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Bruce E JohnsonDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Kai-Li LiawMerck, Kenilworth, NJ.
Mayur AmonkarMerck, Kenilworth, NJ.
Alanna J ChurchHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Katherine A JanewayDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Jonathan A NowakHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Lynette ShollHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Nancy U LinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Jason M JohnsonInformatics and Analytics Department, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.

Funding

The roles of anti-apoptotic proteins BCL-XL and MCL1 in mediating survival of high-grade serous ovarian cancer following drug-induced DNA damageK08CA237871 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI STOVER, ELIZABETH HARMON · 2019 to 2023
$921k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA237871
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGiven regulatory approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with mismatch repair-deficient (MMR-D) cancers agnostic to tumor type, it has become important to characterize occurrence of MMR-D and develop cost-effective screening approaches. Using a next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel (OncoPanel), we developed an algorithm to identify MMR-D frequency in tumor samples and applied it in a clinical setting with pathologist review.

methodsTo predict MMR-D, we adapted methods described previously for use in NGS panels, which assess patterns of single base-pair insertion or deletion events occurring in homopolymer regions. Tumors assayed with OncoPanel between July 2013 and July 2018 were included. For tumors tested after June 2017, sequencing results were presented to pathologists in real time for clinical MMR determination, in the context of tumor mutation burden, other mutational signatures, and clinical data.

resultsOf 20,301 tumors sequenced, 2.7% (553) were retrospectively classified as MMR-D by the algorithm. Of 4,404 samples with pathologist sign-out of MMR status, the algorithm classified 147 (3.3%) as MMR-D: in 116 cases, MMR-D was confirmed by a pathologist, five cases were overruled by the pathologist, and 26 were assessed as indeterminate. Overall, the highest frequencies of OncoPanel-inferred MMR-D were in endometrial (21%; 152/723), colorectal (9.7%; 169/1,744), and small bowel (9.3%; 9/97) cancers. When algorithm predictions were compared with historical MMR immunohistochemistry or polymerase chain reaction results in a set of 325 tumors sequenced before initiation of pathologist assessment, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the algorithm were 91.1% and 98.2%, respectively.

conclusionWe show that targeted, tumor-only NGS can be leveraged to determine MMR signatures across tumor types, suggesting that broader biomarker screening approaches may have clinical value.

Identifiers

PMID35050773
PMCPMC10445788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.