Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35050699›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of audiology2022

The Impacts of Noise Exposure on the Middle Ear Muscle Reflex in a Veteran Population.

Naomi F Bramhall, Kelly M Reavis, M Patrick Feeney, Sean D Kampel

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of audiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Short-term test-retest reliability of a few proxy measures of cochlear synaptopathy.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Rapid Characterization of Middle-Ear Muscle Reflexes Using Swept Elicitors.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Wideband Acoustic Reflex Measurement.Seminars in hearing · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Naomi F BramhallVA RR&D National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, OR.ORCID 0000-0003-1660-5322
Kelly M ReavisVA RR&D National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, OR.ORCID 0000-0002-4906-1010
M Patrick FeeneyVA RR&D National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, OR.ORCID 0000-0002-0647-5977
Sean D KampelVA RR&D National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, OR.
Oregon Health & Science University · USVA Portland Health Care System · US

Funding

Uncovering Physiological Markers of Hidden Hearing LossIK2RX002104 · VA · PORTLAND VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BRAMHALL, NAOMI · 2016 to 2021
–
RRD VA I50 RX002361RRD VA IK2 RX002104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHuman studies of noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy using physiological indicators identified in animal models (auditory brainstem response [ABR] Wave I amplitude, envelope following response [EFR], and middle ear muscle reflex [MEMR]) have yielded mixed findings. Differences in the population studied may have contributed to the differing results. For example, due to differences in the intensity level of the noise exposure, noise-induced synaptopathy may be easier to detect in a military Veteran population than in populations with recreational noise exposure. We previously demonstrated a reduction in ABR Wave I amplitude and EFR magnitude for young Veterans with normal audiograms reporting high levels of noise exposure compared to non-Veteran controls. In this article, we expand on the previous analysis in the same population to determine if MEMR magnitude is similarly reduced.

methodContralateral MEMR growth functions were obtained in 92 young Veterans and non-Veterans with normal audiograms, and the relationship between noise exposure history and MEMR magnitude was assessed. Associations between MEMR magnitude and distortion product otoacoustic emission, EFR, and ABR measurements collected in the same sample were also evaluated.

resultsThe results of the statistical analysis, although not conventionally statistically significant, suggest a reduction in mean MEMR magnitude for Veterans reporting high noise exposure compared with non-Veteran controls. In addition, the MEMR appears relatively insensitive to subclinical outer hair cell dysfunction, as measured by distortion product otoacoustic emissions, and is not well correlated with ABR and EFR measurements.

conclusionsWhen combined with our previous ABR and EFR findings in the same population, these results suggest that noise-induced synaptopathy occurs in humans. In addition, the findings indicate that the MEMR may be a good candidate for noninvasive diagnosis of cochlear synaptopathy/deafferentation and that the MEMR may reflect the integrity of different neural populations than the ABR and EFR. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.18665645.

Indexed as

Hearing Loss, Noise-InducedVeteransAnimalsAuditory ThresholdCochleaEar, MiddleEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemHumansMusclesOtoacoustic Emissions, SpontaneousReflex

Identifiers

PMID35050699
PMCPMC10831927
OpenAlexW4206138410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.