ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2022
Addressing rural health disparity with a novel hospital sleep apnea screening: Precision of a high-resolution pulse oximeter in screening for sleep-disordered breathing.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Home-testing devices for diagnosing obstructive sleep apnoea hypopnoea syndrome - a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence augmented home sleep apnea testing device study (AISAP study).PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeHigh-resolution pulse oximetry (HRPO) may offer a low-cost and simple screening option for sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) that could be vitally important in rural areas with limited healthcare resources and specialty care. Our team hypothesized that application of this technology to a broad cohort of rural dwelling hospitalized individuals would demonstrate congruence similar to previous urban studies comparing HRPO to portable sleep monitors.
methodsThis retrospective study was conducted at West Virginia University Hospital and compared indices obtained from HRPO with those obtained from a type III portable sleep monitor (PM) on the same night.
resultsA total of 365 individuals underwent evaluation. The mean oxygen desaturation index (18.8 ± 19.3 events/h) from the HRPO was slightly higher than the mean respiratory event index (16.0 ± 18.1 events/h, p ≤ 0.001) from the PM. ROC curves were developed for thresholds of apnea severity predicted by the screening program. The AUC values for all three thresholds exceeded 0.92 and for a respiratory event index (REI) of ≥ 30 was 0.965. Indices from the PM and HRPO demonstrated agreement in those individuals with screening suggestive of moderate to severe disease.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that use of HRPO in screening for SDB in hospitalized patients from rural communities is as accurate as PM and may serve as a simple cost-effective tool to address sleep health disparities in these regions with significant health inequity. Our data extend previous findings by applying HRPO to a larger hospitalized cohort with highly prevalent cardiopulmonary disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.