Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35050442›Full record

Trial reportGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2022

Broad spectrum of regorafenib activity on mutant KIT and absence of clonal selection in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): correlative analysis from the GRID trial.

Michael Jeffers, Christian Kappeler, Iris Kuss, Georg Beckmann, Daniel H Mehnert, Johannes Fredebohm, Michael Teufel

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Clinical impact of primary and secondary KIT mutations on the efficacy of molecular-targeted therapies in gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael JeffersBayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, 100 Bayer Blvd, Whippany, NJ, 07981, USA. michael.jeffers@bayer.com.
Christian KappelerBayer Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany.
Iris KussBayer Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany.
Georg BeckmannBayer Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany.
Daniel H MehnertSysmex Inostics GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
Johannes FredebohmSysmex Inostics GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
Michael TeufelBayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, 100 Bayer Blvd, Whippany, NJ, 07981, USA.
Bayer (Germany) · DESysmex (Germany) · DEBayer (United States) · USBoehringer Ingelheim (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the phase 3 GRID trial, regorafenib improved progression-free survival (PFS) independent of KIT mutations in exons 9 and 11. In this retrospective, exploratory analysis of the GRID trial, we investigated whether a more comprehensive KIT mutation analysis could identify mutations that impact treatment outcome with regorafenib and a regorafenib-induced mutation pattern.

methodsArchived tumor samples, collected at any time prior to enrollment in GRID, were analyzed by Sanger sequencing (n = 102) and next-generation sequencing (FoundationONE; n = 47). Plasma samples collected at baseline were analyzed by BEAMing (n = 163) and SafeSEQ (n = 96).

resultsIn archived tumor samples, 67% (68/102) had a KIT mutation; 61% (62/102) had primary KIT mutations (exons 9 and 11) and 12% (12/102) had secondary mutations (exons 13, 14, 17, and 18). At baseline, 81% of samples (78/96) had KIT mutations by SafeSEQ, including the M541L polymorphism (sole event in 6 patients). Coexisting mutations in other oncogenes were rare, as were mutations in PDGFR, KRAS, and BRAF. Regorafenib showed PFS benefit across all primary and secondary KIT mutational subgroups examined. Available patient-matched samples taken at baseline and end of treatment (n = 41; SafeSEQ), revealed heterogeneous KIT mutational changes with no specific mutation pattern emerging upon regorafenib treatment.

conclusionThese data support the results of the GRID trial, and suggest that patients may benefit from regorafenib in the presence of KIT mutations and without the selection of particular mutation patterns that confer resistance. The study was not powered to address biomarker-related questions, and the results are exploratory and hypothesis-generating.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsStomach NeoplasmsHumansMutationPhenylurea CompoundsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitPyridinesReceptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor alphaRetrospective StudiesAntineoplastic AgentsPhenylurea CompoundsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitPyridinesReceptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor alpharegorafenibGISTKITMutation analysisRegorafenib

Identifiers

PMID35050442
PMCPMC9013336
OpenAlexW4206535195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.