ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2023
Reverse rhino sign as a radiological sign of low-grade infected reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inferior Glenoid HyperOSTosis (GHOST) lesion development following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLow-grade infections following shoulder surgery are difficult to diagnose. Recently, curved-shaped bony spurs, further mentioned "reverse rhino signs" because of its shape, growing inferior on the glenoid were noticed on X-rays of patients with a reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) and a Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes) infection. This study aimed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the reverse rhino sign as a radiological marker for detecting low-grade shoulder infections in RSA. MATERIALS AND
methodsA diagnostic study was performed including patients who underwent revision surgery of an RSA with perioperative cultures taken. Blinded radiographic evaluation was performed by two orthopedic surgeons for presence of rhino signs, humeral osteophytes, and notching. Efficacy measures of the reverse rhino sign for detecting low-grade infections were determined. Furthermore, results were stratified for notching and gender.
resultsThirty-two revised RSA patients had a low-grade infection and 36 had no infection. Seventeen (53%) patients with infection had a reverse rhino sign present, compared to 6 (17%) in the non-infection group. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of the reverse rhino sign were, respectively, 53%, 83%, 74%, and 67%. These measures changed to 68%, 77%, 72%, and 74% for patients without notching and to 47%, 100%, 100%, and 8% for males.
conclusionIn the absence of a reverse rhino sign in RSA patients, a low-grade shoulder infection is unlikely. Hence, the reverse rhino sign can be used to rule in a low-grade shoulder infection, especially in males and in the absence of notching. Low-grade infections should be considered in patients with unexplained persistent shoulder complaints after RSA placement, especially when a rhino sign is present. For these patients, we advise to perform mini-open biopsy for cultures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic level IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.