SynthesisHNO2022
[Management of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw-a review of recent study results in comparison to established strategies].
Synthesis in HNO, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Contribution of Antiangiogenic Agents to the Risk of Medication-related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Combination with Antiresorptive Agents: Preliminary Results in a Comparative Prospective Report of 59 Oncologic Cases.Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAntiresorptive agents are some of the most frequently used drugs worldwide, with indications in osteology and oncology. They are generally well tolerated and display a favorable safety profile. A potentially severe unwanted side effect is medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). PURPOSE OF THIS REVIEW: This review summarizes the latest developments in etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of MRONJ, and compares new insights with established algorithms.
methodsA systematic review of relevant studies exploring diagnostic methods, prospective management trials, and innovative studies on the pathogenesis of MRONJ published between 2016 and 2021 was performed. The study quality was assessed using the MINORS (methodological index for non-randomized studies) rating score. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The prevalence of MRONJ in patients undergoing treatment with antiresorptive drugs for oncological reasons is remarkable (2-12%). MRONJ prevalence in patients receiving antiresorptive drugs for the treatment of osteoporosis is much lower (0.1-1%). MRONJ treatment should be initiated early and involve a surgical approach. MRONJ treatment is safe and predictable, with long-term success rates of more than 85%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.