ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2022
Spatiotemporal patterns of a diffusive prey-predator model with spatial memory and pregnancy period in an intimidatory environment.
Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spatial memory and predator-induced fear have recently been considered in modeling population dynamics of animals independently. This paper is the first to integrate both aspects in a prey-predator model with pregnancy cycle to investigate the direct and indirect effects of predation on the spatial distribution of prey. We extensively study Turing instability and Hopf bifurcation. When the prey population has slow memory-based diffusion, the model is easier to generate Turing patterns. While when the prey population has fast memory-based diffusion, the model can exhibit rich dynamics. Specifically, (1) for the model with spatial memory delay only, the prey population with long term memory shows a spatially nonhomogeneous periodic distribution; (2) for the model with pregnancy delay only, the prey population with long pregnancy cycles shows a spatially homogeneous (or nonhomogeneous) periodic distribution, and (3) for the model with both the two time delays, more interesting spatiotemporal dynamics can be observed for long memory delay and (or) long pregnancy cycles. Our findings indicate that both spatial memory and pregnancy cycle play significant roles in the pattern formation of prey-predator interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35050381What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.