Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35049793›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Associations between Feeding Behaviors Collected from an Automated Milk Feeder and Neonatal Calf Diarrhea in Group Housed Dairy Calves: A Case-Control Study.

Meridith H Conboy, Charlotte B Winder, Melissa C Cantor, Joao H C Costa, Michael A Steele, Catalina Medrano-Galarza, Taika E von Konigslow, Amanda Kerr, Dave L Renaud

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Welfare of calves.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Meridith H ConboyDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4613-2503
Charlotte B WinderDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7314-3657
Melissa C CantorDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4963-064X
Joao H C CostaDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40508, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9311-4741
Michael A SteeleDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
Catalina Medrano-GalarzaDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2690-189X
Taika E von KonigslowDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
Amanda KerrGrober Nutrition, Cambridge, ON N1T 1S4, Canada.
Dave L RenaudDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3439-3987
University of Guelph · CAUniversidad Antonio Nariño · COUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

Food From Thought, Canada First Research Excellence Fund N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this case-control study was to determine if feeding behavior data collected from an automated milk feeder (AMF) could be used to predict neonatal calf diarrhea (NCD) in the days surrounding diagnosis in pre-weaned group housed dairy calves. Data were collected from two research farms in Ontario between 2017 and 2020 where calves fed using an AMF were health scored daily and feeding behavior data (milk intake (mL/d), drinking speed (mL/min), number of rewarded or unrewarded visits) was collected. Calves with NCD were pair matched to healthy controls (31 pairs) by farm, gender, and age at case diagnosis to assess for differences in feeding behavior between case and control calves. Calves were first diagnosed with NCD on day 0, and a NCD case was defined as calves with a fecal score of ≥2 for 2 consecutive days, where control calves remained healthy. Repeated measure mixed linear regression models were used to determine if there were differences between case and control calves in their daily AMF feeding behavior data in the days surrounding diagnosis of NCD (-3 to +5 days). Calves with NCD consumed less milk on day 0, day 1, day 3, day 4 and day 5 following diagnosis compared to control calves. Calves with NCD also had fewer rewarded visits to the AMF on day -1, and day 0 compared to control calves. However, while there was a NCD status x day interaction for unrewarded visits, there was only a tendency for differences between NCD and control calves on day 0. In this study, feeding behaviors were not clinically useful to make diagnosis of NCD due to insufficient diagnostic ability. However, feeding behaviors are a useful screening tool for producers to identify calves requiring further attention.

Indexed as

automatedcalf healthgroup housingprecision dairyprecision livestock farming

Identifiers

PMID35049793
PMCPMC8772582
OpenAlexW4206775444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.