Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35049750›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Targeting Ocular Drug Delivery: An Examination of Local Anatomy and Current Approaches.

Emily Dosmar, Julia Walsh, Michael Doyel, Katlynn Bussett, Adekite Oladipupo, Sabri Amer, Katherine Goebel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Motion Compensation and Adaptive Force Control via iOCT-FBG Sensor Fusion for Robotic Subretinal Injection.IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation : ICRA : [proceedings]. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Insights into Tear Viscosity: A Study of 240 Volunteers.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Recent advances and future challenges in nanosystems for ocular drug delivery.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Long-Acting Ocular Injectables: Are We Looking In The Right Direction?Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  20. How Advanced are Nanocarriers for Effective Subretinal Injection?International journal of nanomedicine · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emily DosmarDepartment of Biology and Biomedical Engineering, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre Haute, IN 47803, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6341-7530
Julia WalshDepartment of Biology and Biomedical Engineering, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre Haute, IN 47803, USA.
Michael DoyelDepartment of Biology and Biomedical Engineering, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre Haute, IN 47803, USA.
Katlynn BussettDepartment of Biology and Biomedical Engineering, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre Haute, IN 47803, USA.
Adekite OladipupoDepartment of Biology and Biomedical Engineering, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre Haute, IN 47803, USA.
Sabri AmerDepartment of Biology and Biomedical Engineering, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre Haute, IN 47803, USA.
Katherine GoebelDepartment of Biology and Biomedical Engineering, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre Haute, IN 47803, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ocular drug delivery remains the focus of much modern research. Primary routes of administration include the surface, the intravitreal space, the subretinal space, and the subconjunctival space, each with its own series of unique challenges, limitations, and advantages. Each of these approaches requires careful consideration of the local anatomy, physical barriers, and key cells as well as the interface between the anatomy and the drug or drug system being delivered. While least invasive, the topical route poses a challenge with the many physical barriers that prevent drug penetration into the eye; while injection into the intravitreal, subretinal, and subconjunctival spaces are direct and targeted but limited due to the many internal clearance mechanisms and potential for damage to the eye. Polymeric-based, sustained-release drug delivery systems have been identified as a potential solution to many of these challenges; however, the design and successful implementation of a sustained-release system that is well-tolerated, bioactive, biocompatible, and degradable remains, in many cases, only in the early stages. The drugs and biomaterials in question also require special attention as small chemical changes could result in vastly different outcomes. This paper explores the anatomy and key cells of these four primary drug delivery routes as well as the interface between drug and drug delivery systems and the anatomy, reviewing the recent developments and current state of research in each area. Finally, this paper also examines the frequently used drugs and biomaterials found in ocular drug delivery and summarizes the primary interactions observed.

Indexed as

anatomybiomaterialsdrug deliveryintravitrealocular surfacesubconjunctivalsubretinal

Identifiers

PMID35049750
PMCPMC8772869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.