Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35049675›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2021

Management Strategies for Older Patients with Low-Risk Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Physician Survey.

Mashari Alzahrani, Mark Clemons, Lynn Chang, Lisa Vendermeer, Angel Arnaout, Gail Larocque, Katherine Cole, Tina Hsu, Deanna Saunders, Marie-France Savard

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04921137 (A Randomised, Multicentre Trial Evaluating Harms and Benefits of Endocrine Therapy in Patients ≥70 Years of Age With Lower Risk Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04921137 phase4recruitingnot on this map

A Randomised, Multicentre Trial Evaluating Harms and Benefits of Endocrine Therapy in Patients ≥70 Years of Age With Lower Risk Breast Cancer (REaCT-70)

TypeinterventionalSponsorOttawa Hospital Research InstituteRan2021 to 2036Enrolled500ConditionsBreast CancerArmsNo endocrine therapy, Endocrine therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mashari AlzahraniDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.
Mark ClemonsDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9392-8219
Lynn ChangDepartment of Radiology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre and The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.
Lisa VendermeerCancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada.
Angel ArnaoutCancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada.
Gail LarocqueThe Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.
Katherine ColeDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.
Tina HsuDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.
Deanna SaundersCancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada.
Marie-France SavardDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7651-0870

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When managing older patients with lower-risk hormone-receptor-positive (HR+), HER2 negative (HER2-) early-stage breast cancer (EBC), the harms and benefits of adjuvant therapies should be taken into consideration. A survey was conducted among Canadian oncologists on the definitions of "low risk" and "older", practice patterns, and future trial designs. We contacted 254 physicians and 21% completed the survey (50/242). Most respondents (68%, 34/50) agreed with the definition of "low risk" HR+/HER2- EBC being node-negative and either: ≤3 cm and low histological grade, ≤2 cm and intermediate grade, or ≤1 cm and high grade. The most popular chronological and biological age definition for older patients was ≥70 (45%, 22/49; 45% 21/47). In patients ≥ 70 with low risk EBC, most radiation and medical oncologists would recommend post-lumpectomy radiotherapy (RT) and endocrine therapy (ET). Seventy-eight percent (38/49) felt that trials are needed to evaluate RT and ET's role in patients ≥ 70. The favored design was ET alone, vs. RT plus ET (39%, 15/38). The preferred primary and secondary endpoints were disease-free survival and quality of life, respectively. Although oncologists recommended both RT and ET, there is interest in performing de-escalation trials in patients ≥ 70.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsPhysiciansCanadaFemaleHumansQuality of LifeSurveys and Questionnairesadjuvantbreast cancerelderlyendocrine therapyolder patientsradiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID35049675
PMCPMC8774930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.