ReviewBiosensors2021
Wearable Sensors for the Detection of Biomarkers for Wound Infection.
Review in Biosensors, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multifunctional conductive dressings for wound healing support.Chemical science · 2026Review
- Advancements in Smart Wound Dressings: Leveraging Sensor Technology for Real-Time Wound Monitoring and Management.Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Microbial-Responsive Wound Dressings Based on Biopolymer Degradation Strategy for Detecting Bacterial Infections.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026Article
- Microbial allies in skin trauma recovery: from immune modulation to engineered probiotic therapeutics.Burns & trauma · 2026Review
- Infection-driven proliferative phase impairment in chronic wounds: a mechanistic framework for precision regenerative therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Deciphering skin architecture, wound pathophysiology and molecular mechanisms of healing: insights into immune response and therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- The Role of Natural Hydrogels in Enhancing Wound Healing: From Biomaterials to Bioactive Therapies.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Microfluidic technologies for wearable and implantable biomedical devices.Lab on a chip · 2025Review
- Bioengineered nanoparticles for targeted topical delivery in wound healing: advances and future outlook.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Review
- Antimicrobial Smart Dressings for Combating Antibiotic Resistance in Wound Care.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Three-dimensional bio-derived materials for biomedical applications: challenges and opportunities.RSC advances · 2025Review
- VIEshunt: towards a ventricular intelligent and electromechanical shunt for hydrocephalus therapy.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2025Article
- Trends and Advances in Wearable Plasmonic Sensors Utilizing Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS): A Comprehensive Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
- Biofilm Resilience: Molecular Mechanisms Driving Antibiotic Resistance in Clinical Contexts.Biology · 2025Review
- A Smart Semi-Implantable Device Integrating Microchannel-Enhanced Sampling and Multiplex Biochemical Testing for Deep Wound Monitoring and Pathogen Identification.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Therapeutic Potential of Microneedle Assisted Drug Delivery for Wound Healing: Current State of the Art, Challenges, and Future Perspective.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2025Review
- Research trends and hot topics of wearable sensors in wound care over past 18 years: A bibliometric analysis.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Deep learning framework for sensor array precision and accuracy enhancement.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Infection represents a major complication that can affect wound healing in any type of wound, especially in chronic ones. There are currently certain limitations to the methods that are used for establishing a clinical diagnosis of wound infection. Thus, new, rapid and easy-to-use strategies for wound infection diagnosis need to be developed. To this aim, wearable sensors for infection diagnosis have been recently developed. These sensors are incorporated into the wound dressings that are used to treat and protect the wound, and are able to detect certain biomarkers that can be correlated with the presence of wound infection. Among these biomarkers, the most commonly used ones are pH and uric acid, but a plethora of others (lactic acid, oxygenation, inflammatory mediators, bacteria metabolites or bacteria) have also been detected using wearable sensors. In this work, an overview of the main types of wearable sensors for wound infection detection will be provided. These sensors will be divided into electrochemical, colorimetric and fluorimetric sensors and the examples will be presented and discussed comparatively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.