ReviewDentistry journal2022
Simulating the Intraoral Aging of Dental Bonding Agents: A Narrative Review.
Review in Dentistry journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Does cleaning of post space before cementation of fiber reinforced post affect the push-out bond strength to resin cement?BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Evaluation of a long-term antimicrobial dental adhesive via in vitro biodegradation and in vivo rodent secondary caries models.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2025Article
- Two-Year Bonding Performances of a Universal Adhesive After Dentin Pre-Treatment With Two-Step Silver-Containing Solutions.The journal of adhesive dentistry · 2025Article
- Effect of Different Aging Methods on Surface Microhardness and Roughness of Anterior Resin Composites: An In Vitro Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Synergistic effects of bacteria, enzymes, and cyclic mechanical stresses on the bond strength of composite restorations.Biomaterials advances · 2025Article
- Advantages and feasibility of prefabricated PEEK crowns for aesthetic restoration in primary teeth.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Analyses of Experimental Dental Adhesives Based on Zirconia/Silver Phosphate Nanoparticles.Polymers · 2023Article
- Effect of at-home and in-office bleaching on microleakage of class V composite resin restorations using different types of universal adhesives: An in vitro study.Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Despite their popularity, resin composite restorations fail earlier and at higher rates than comparable amalgam restorations. One of the reasons for these rates of failure are the properties of current dental bonding agents. Modern bonding agents are vulnerable to gradual chemical and mechanical degradation from a number of avenues such as daily use in chewing, catalytic hydrolysis facilitated by salivary or bacterial enzymes, and thermal fluctuations. These stressors have been found to work synergistically, all contributing to the deterioration and eventual failure of the hybrid layer. Due to the expense and difficulty in conducting in vivo experiments, in vitro protocols meant to accurately simulate the oral environment's stressors are important in the development of bonding agents and materials that are more resistant to these processes of degradation. This narrative review serves to summarize the currently employed methods of aging dental materials and critically appraise them in the context of our knowledge of the oral environment's parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.