Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35049516›Full record

ReviewJMIR medical informatics2022

The Use of Blockchain Technology in the Health Care Sector: Systematic Review.

Deepa Elangovan, Chiau Soon Long, Faizah Safina Bakrin, Ching Siang Tan, Khang Wen Goh, Siang Fei Yeoh, Mei Jun Loy, Zahid Hussain, Kah Seng Lee, Azam Che Idris and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
28.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Home-based treatment for patients with hematological cancer in Denmark-A national overview.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Deepa ElangovanSchool of Pharmacy, KPJ Healthcare University College, Nilai, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9732-1051
Chiau Soon LongFaculty of Computing and Engineering, Quest International University, Ipoh, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6895-2927
Faizah Safina BakrinSchool of Pharmacy, KPJ Healthcare University College, Nilai, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6154-6707
Ching Siang TanSchool of Pharmacy, KPJ Healthcare University College, Nilai, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5069-3314
Khang Wen GohFaculty of Information Technology, INTI International University, Nilai, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6686-7019
Siang Fei YeohDepartment of Pharmacy, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0763-2639
Mei Jun LoyFaculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1562-8709
Zahid HussainFaculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0819-3380
Kah Seng LeeFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Cyberjaya, Cyberjaya, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6235-0848
Azam Che IdrisFaculty of Integrated Technologies, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong, Brunei Darussalam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0172-0205
Long Chiau MingPengiran Anak Puteri Rashidah Sa'adatul Bolkiah Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong, Brunei Darussalam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6971-1383
Nilai University · MYUniversiti Brunei Darussalam · BNINTI International University · MYNational University Hospital · SGQuest International University Perak · MYUniversity of Canberra · AUUniversity of Cyberjaya · MYUniversity of Technology Malaysia · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlockchain technology is a part of Industry 4.0's new Internet of Things applications: decentralized systems, distributed ledgers, and immutable and cryptographically secure technology. This technology entails a series of transaction lists with identical copies shared and retained by different groups or parties. One field where blockchain technology has tremendous potential is health care, due to the more patient-centric approach to the health care system as well as blockchain's ability to connect disparate systems and increase the accuracy of electronic health records.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to systematically review studies on the use of blockchain technology in health care and to analyze the characteristics of the studies that have implemented blockchain technology.

methodsThis study used a systematic review methodology to find literature related to the implementation aspect of blockchain technology in health care. Relevant papers were searched for using PubMed, SpringerLink, IEEE Xplore, Embase, Scopus, and EBSCOhost. A quality assessment of literature was performed on the 22 selected papers by assessing their trustworthiness and relevance.

resultsAfter full screening, 22 papers were included. A table of evidence was constructed, and the results of the selected papers were interpreted. The results of scoring for measuring the quality of the publications were obtained and interpreted. Out of 22 papers, a total of 3 (14%) high-quality papers, 9 (41%) moderate-quality papers, and 10 (45%) low-quality papers were identified.

conclusionsBlockchain technology was found to be useful in real health care environments, including for the management of electronic medical records, biomedical research and education, remote patient monitoring, pharmaceutical supply chains, health insurance claims, health data analytics, and other potential areas. The main reasons for the implementation of blockchain technology in the health care sector were identified as data integrity, access control, data logging, data versioning, and nonrepudiation. The findings could help the scientific community to understand the implementation aspect of blockchain technology. The results from this study help in recognizing the accessibility and use of blockchain technology in the health care sector.

Indexed as

access controlblockchaindata integritydata logginghealth carehealth informaticshospital information system

Identifiers

PMID35049516
PMCPMC8814929
OpenAlexW4205207900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.