Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35049474›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science2022

Prevalence of common mental disorders and treatment receipt for people from ethnic minority backgrounds in England: repeated cross-sectional surveys of the general population in 2007 and 2014.

Gargie Ahmad, Sally McManus, Claudia Cooper, Stephani L Hatch, Jayati Das-Munshi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gargie AhmadDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0988-7587
Sally McManusViolence and Society Centre, City, University of London, and National Centre for Social Research, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2711-0819
Claudia CooperDivision of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, UK.
Stephani L HatchESRC Centre for Society and Mental Health, King's College London, UK.
Jayati Das-MunshiESRC Centre for Society and Mental Health, King's College London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3913-6859
King's College London · GBCity, University of London · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Department of Health IS-BRC-1215-20018Department of Health NIHR200152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConcerns persist that some ethnic minority groups experience longstanding mental health inequalities in England. It is unclear if these have changed over time.

aimsTo assess the prevalence of common mental disorders (CMDs) and treatment receipt by ethnicity, and changes over time, using data from the nationally representative probability sample in the Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Surveys.

methodWe used survey data from 2007 (

resultsCMD prevalence was highest in the Black group; ethnic variation was explained by demographic and socioeconomic factors. After adjustment for these factors and CMDs, odds ratios for treatment receipt were lower for the Asian (0.62, 95% CI 0.39-1.00) and White Other (0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.87) groups in 2014, compared with the White British group; for the Black group, this inequality appeared to be widening over time (2007 treatment receipt odds ratio 0.68, 95% CI 0.38-1.23; 2014 treatment receipt odds ratio 0.23, 95% CI 0.13-0.40; survey year interaction

conclusionsTreatment receipt was lower for all ethnic minority groups compared with the White British group, and lowest among Black people, for whom inequalities appear to be widening over time. Addressing socioeconomic inequality could reduce ethnic inequalities in mental health problems, but this does not explain pronounced treatment inequalities.

Indexed as

EthnicityMental DisordersAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEthnic and Racial MinoritiesHumansMinority GroupsPrevalencecommon mental disordersEthnicitymental health inequalitiessocial epidemiologytreatment inequalities

Identifiers

PMID35049474
PMCPMC7616892
OpenAlexW4200579933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.