Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35049318›Full record

ArticleBehavioral neuroscience2022

Cortical taste processing evolves through benign taste exposures.

Veronica L Flores, Bailey Tanner, Donald B Katz, Jian-You Lin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Veronica L FloresDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0001-5793-0979
Bailey TannerDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0002-8210-801X
Donald B KatzDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0002-8444-6063
Jian-You LinDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0001-7445-2278

Funding

The amygdala-cortical loop as the basis of taste processingR01DC007703 · NIDCD · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI Donald B Katz · 2006 to 2026
$7.1M
Time and the forebrain coding of taste learning.R01DC006666 · NIDCD · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI KATZ, DONALD B · 2005 to 2025
$6.3M
Palatability Coding and Gustatory CortexR21DC016706 · NIDCD · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI LIN, JIAN-YOU · 2018 to 2020
$488k
The experienced palette is a smart one: Investigating the role of taste specific brain regions in the impact of experience on taste learningF31DC015931 · NIDCD · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI FLORES, VERONICA L. · 2017 to 2018
$54k
National Institutes of Health; National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication DisordersNational Science FoundationNIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC015931NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006666NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC007703NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC016706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experience impacts learning and perception. Familiarity with stimuli that later become the conditioned stimulus (CS) in a learning paradigm, for instance, reduces the strength of that learning-a fact well documented in studies of conditioned taste aversion (CTA; De la Casa & Lubow, 1995; Lubow, 1973; Lubow & Moore, 1959). Recently, we have demonstrated that even experience with "incidental" (i.e., non-CS) stimuli influences CTA learning: Long Evans rats pre-exposed to salty and/or sour tastes later learn unusually strong aversions to novel sucrose (Flores et al., 2016), and exhibit enhanced sucrose-responsiveness after learning in gustatory cortex (GC; Flores et al., 2018). These findings suggest that incidental taste exposure (TE) may change spiking responses that have been shown to underlie the processing of tastes in GC. Here, we test this hypothesis, evaluating whether GC neuron spiking responses change across 3 days of taste exposure. Our results demonstrate that the discriminability of GC ensemble taste responses increases with this familiarization. Analysis of single-neuron responses recorded across multiple sessions reveals that taste exposure not only enriches identity and palatability information in taste-evoked activity but also enhances the discriminability of even novel tastes. These findings demonstrate that "mere" familiarization with incidental episodes of tasting changes the neural spiking responses of taste processing and provides specific insight into how such TE may impact later learning. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

TasteTaste PerceptionAnimalsLearningNeuronsRatsRats, Long-Evans

Identifiers

PMID35049318
PMCPMC9194879
OpenAlexW4206484996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.