ArticleJournal of cosmetic dermatology2022
Creation and validation of a photonumeric scale for assessment of lip fullness.
Article in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness and Safety of RHA3 vs a Comparator Product for Lip Augmentation: A Randomized, Controlled, Prospective, Multicenter Clinical Study.Aesthetic surgery journal · 2025Trial
- Lip Augmentation With Saypha LIPS Lidocaine: A Postmarket, Prospective, Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Study To Evaluate Its Efficacy and Short- and Long-term Safety.Aesthetic surgery journal · 2024Trial
- Creation and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Assessment of Midface Volume Deficit.Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.] · 2026Article
- Optimizing Infraorbital Hollows Treatment With Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: Overview of Anatomy, Injection Techniques, and Product Considerations.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2025Review
- Safety and Efficacy of a New Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Lip Augmentation: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Study.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2025Article
- Instagram vs Reality: Assessment of the Representation of Lip Aesthetic Subtypes on Social Media Using the Lip Classification of Tubercles System.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2025Article
- Creation and validation of a photonumeric scale for assessment of lip fullness.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundValidated, objective clinical scales are needed to assess aesthetic improvement of the lips after augmentation with dermal fillers.
objectiveTo develop a lip fullness rating scale and establish its reliability for grading subjects in clinical trials or routine practice, and sensitivity for detecting clinically meaningful changes.
methodsThe Teoxane Lip Fullness Scale (TLFS), a proprietary, 5-grade photonumeric scale, was developed by clinical experts based on real subject photographs and was validated through both photographic and live subjects' evaluation.
resultsClinician intra- and inter-rater agreement for the TLFS was substantial to almost perfect. Mean intra-rater weighted Kappa score between the two rounds of photographic validation was 0.92, and inter-rater agreement was substantial with an ICC of 0.93 for the combined rounds. Average intra-rater weighted Kappa score and inter-rater ICC for the live validation were equally high, reaching 0.91 and 0.89 respectively. Additionally, evaluators identified clinically significant differences between photographs of subjects presenting a 1-grade or 2-grade difference on the scale in 90% and 98% of cases, respectively.
conclusionsThe intra-rater Kappa scores and inter-rater ICC met their pre-determined acceptance criteria of >0.70 in the photographic and live validation. The TLFS was shown to be a repeatable and reproducible Clinician Reported Outcome (Clin-RO) for healthcare providers to classify lip fullness both in clinical trials and in routine patient care. A 1-grade difference on the TLFS can detect a clinically meaningful difference in lip fullness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.