Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35049135›Full record

ArticleJournal of cosmetic dermatology2022

Creation and validation of a photonumeric scale for assessment of lip fullness.

Patrick Trevidic, Wayne Carey, Anthony V Benedetto, John H Joseph, Laura Eaton, Stéphanie Antunes, Pauline Maffert

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Creation and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Assessment of Midface Volume Deficit.Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.] · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Patrick TrevidicExpert 2 Expert, Paris, France.
Wayne CareySiena Medical Research Corporation, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Anthony V BenedettoDepartment of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4280-9380
John H JosephClinical Testing of Beverly Hills, Beverly Hills, California, USA.
Laura EatonUltaMed Corporation, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA.
Stéphanie AntunesTeoxane SA, Geneva, Switzerland.
Pauline MaffertTeoxane SA, Geneva, Switzerland.
Beverly Hills Cardiology · USExpert System (Italy) · ITGDI Integrated Facility Services (Canada) · CAUniversity of Fort Lauderdale · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Teoxane Laboratories, Geneva
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundValidated, objective clinical scales are needed to assess aesthetic improvement of the lips after augmentation with dermal fillers.

objectiveTo develop a lip fullness rating scale and establish its reliability for grading subjects in clinical trials or routine practice, and sensitivity for detecting clinically meaningful changes.

methodsThe Teoxane Lip Fullness Scale (TLFS), a proprietary, 5-grade photonumeric scale, was developed by clinical experts based on real subject photographs and was validated through both photographic and live subjects' evaluation.

resultsClinician intra- and inter-rater agreement for the TLFS was substantial to almost perfect. Mean intra-rater weighted Kappa score between the two rounds of photographic validation was 0.92, and inter-rater agreement was substantial with an ICC of 0.93 for the combined rounds. Average intra-rater weighted Kappa score and inter-rater ICC for the live validation were equally high, reaching 0.91 and 0.89 respectively. Additionally, evaluators identified clinically significant differences between photographs of subjects presenting a 1-grade or 2-grade difference on the scale in 90% and 98% of cases, respectively.

conclusionsThe intra-rater Kappa scores and inter-rater ICC met their pre-determined acceptance criteria of >0.70 in the photographic and live validation. The TLFS was shown to be a repeatable and reproducible Clinician Reported Outcome (Clin-RO) for healthcare providers to classify lip fullness both in clinical trials and in routine patient care. A 1-grade difference on the TLFS can detect a clinically meaningful difference in lip fullness.

Indexed as

LipPhotographyHealth PersonnelHumansObserver VariationReproducibility of Resultsdermal fillerfacialmeasuring methods

Identifiers

PMID35049135
PMCPMC9413955
OpenAlexW4206192048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.