ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2022
Optimization of
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Instrumentation Digital Twins in PET and SPECT Imaging: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Directions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- Evaluation of Deep Learning-Based OCTA Denoising in Retinal Vessel Assessment.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Gamma camera imaging characteristics ofEJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Optimization of Image Quality in Pelvis Lymphoscintigraphy SPECT/CT Using Discovery NM/CT 670.World journal of nuclear medicine · 2025Article
- The SwiftScan step-and-shoot continuous mode improves SPECT scanning efficiency: a preliminary phantom and clinical test.EJNMMI physics · 2025Review
- Review
- Gamma camera imaging characteristics ofEJNMMI physics · 2024Article
- Study on the knowledge, attitude and practice of single photon emission computed tomography among oncology healthcare professionals.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Feasibility of using counts-per-volume approach with a new SPECT phantom to optimize the relationship between administered dose and acquisition time.Radiological physics and technology · 2023Article
- Investigation and optimization of PET-guided SPECT reconstructions for improved radionuclide therapy dosimetry estimates.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2023Article
- Detection of prostate cancer bone metastases with fast whole-bodyEJNMMI physics · 2022Article
- Transition to Fast Whole-Body SPECT/CT Bone Imaging: An Assessment of Image Quality.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Optimization ofJournal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
- The Impact of Attenuation Correction on Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Image Quality: A Phantom Study.Journal of medical physicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeInvestigate the impact of acquisition time and reconstruction parameters on single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) image quality with the ultimate aim of finding the shortest possible acquisition time for clinical whole-body SPECT/CT (WB-SPECT/CT) while maintaining image quality
methodsThe National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) image quality measurements were performed on a SPECT/CT imaging system using a NEMA International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) phantom with spherical inserts of varying diameter (10-37 mm), filled with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.