Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35049118›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2022

A method for time-independent film dosimetry: Can we obtain accurate patient-specific QA results at any time postirradiation?

Leon Dunn, Guy Godwin, James Hellyer, Xiaolei Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Commissioning of a near real-time in vivo film dosimetry system.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026
    Article
  2. On temporal evolution of the response of EBT4 radiochromic films.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026
    Article
  3. A review on radiochromic film dosimetry in radiation therapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leon DunnSt Vincent's, GenesisCare, Centre for radiation oncology St Vincent's Hospital Basement Level Building C, 41 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy VIC 3065, Melbourne, Victoria, 3065, Australia.
Guy GodwinRedland, Icon Cancer Care, Bayside Business Park, 16/24 Weippin St, Cleveland QLD, Brisbane, Queensland, 4163, Australia.
James HellyerMacquarie University, GenesisCare, Centre for radiation oncology Hospital Building Suite 1, Level B2, 3 Technology Pl, Macquarie University NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, 2109, Australia.
Xiaolei XuSt Vincent's, GenesisCare, Centre for radiation oncology St Vincent's Hospital Basement Level Building C, 41 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy VIC 3065, Melbourne, Victoria, 3065, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this work was twofold. (1) To investigate and present a comparison between EBT3 and EBT-XD in terms of postirradiation color changes. (2) Create an automated workflow to allow radiochromic film (EBT3/XD) to be scanned and converted to dose accurately at any postirradiation time. MATERIALS AND

methodsTen GafChromic EBT-XD calibration films were exposed in 2 Gy increments up to 18 Gy. Calibrates were then scanned at 5-min intervals postirradiation over 24 h using an AutoHotKey script, resulting in 288 TIFF images. Following the 24-h scanning period, a MATLAB script was used to automatically read the tiff images and create a series of 288 calibration curves distinct in time which is termed as the "Temporal Calibration Model" (TCM). The model is saved as a series of polynomial fit coefficients to net optical density as a function of dose, timestamped in 5-min increments. Ten patient-specific film measurements (5 × EBT-XD and 5 × EBT3) were then carried out and scanned using the same 5-min scan intervals from 5 min postirradiation to 24 h postirradiation. The TCM was then automatically applied using eFilmQA software to convert the patient-specific QA films to dose by applying the relevant calibration curve from the TCM, corresponding to the arbitrary postirradiation time that the film was scanned. Each dose plane at postirradiation scan intervals of 5 min up to 20 h was then compared to the ground-truth dose plane using gamma analysis.

resultsGamma pass rates using the TCM at time t, normalized to the pass rate after 20 h postirradiation, were found to have a maximum coefficient of variation of 3% over any postirradiation time. Conversely, not using the TCM resulted in coefficients of variation of up to 39%. Clinical implementation of this method showed an average accuracy of 2.8% when comparing the clinical result to the TCM result.

conclusionsWe have developed a methodology that allows radiochromic film to be accurately used as a dosimeter at any arbitrary scan postirradiation time, whereas previously, waiting periods of 16-24 h before readout were needed to ensure the postirradiation changes had stabilized. The creation of a TCM can enable results from radiochromic film measurements to be obtained quickly postirradiation. Using a conventional single calibration curve generated at 20 h postirradiation can result in gamma pass-rate difference of up to 75% for measurement films scanned at a much shorter postirradiation time.

Indexed as

Film DosimetryRadiation DosimetersAlgorithmsCalibrationHumansSoftware

Identifiers

PMID35049118
PMCPMC8906213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.