Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35048928›Full record

ReviewLab on a chip2022

Bridging the gap between development of point-of-care nucleic acid testing and patient care for sexually transmitted infections.

Kuangwen Hsieh, Johan H Melendez, Charlotte A Gaydos, Tza-Huei Wang

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Lab on a chip, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kuangwen HsiehDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA. thwang@jhu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3730-4406
Johan H MelendezDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6586-051X
Charlotte A GaydosDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1021-3195
Tza-Huei WangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA. thwang@jhu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3540-9354
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

LC: HIV Prevention Trials Network - Laboratory Support for the SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence Study (CoVPN 5002)UM1AI068613 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SUSAN H ESHLEMAN, Mark A Marzinke · 2011 to 2026
$100.2M
Vaccine Response and Immunotherapeutics SWGP30AI094189 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Anna Palmer Durbin · 2012 to 2026
$67.0M
TrainingU54EB007958 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Matthew Hamill · 2007 to 2026
$34.6M
HIV Prevention Trials Network: Network LaboratoryU01AI068613 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ESHLEMAN, SUSAN H · 2006 to 2010
$16.5M
Technology development for point-of-care detection and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Neisseria gonorrhoeaeR01AI138978 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, TZA-HUEI JEFF · 2018 to 2021
$5.1M
Streamlined 15-min HIV Viral Load Self-Testing Using Finger-Stick BloodR61AI154628 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HSIEH, YU-HSIANG, MANABE, YUKARI C · 2020 to 2022
$1.4M
Characterizing Antimicrobial Resistance in Pharyngeal Neisseria gonorrhoeae Infections and the Role of Commensal Neisseria SpeciesK01AI153546 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MELENDEZ, JOHAN HUMBERTO · 2020 to 2024
$651k
NIAID NIH HHS K01 AI153546NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI094189NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI138978NIAID NIH HHS R61 AI154628NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI068613NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB007958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including the four major curable STIs - chlamydia, gonorrhea, trichomoniasis and, syphilis - continue to increase globally, causing medical cost burden and morbidity especially in low and middle-income countries (LMIC). There have seen significant advances in diagnostic testing, but commercial antigen-based point-of-care tests (POCTs) are often insufficiently sensitive and specific, while near-point-of-care (POC) instruments that can perform sensitive and specific nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) are technically complex and expensive, especially for LMIC. Thus, there remains a critical need for NAAT-based STI POCTs that can improve diagnosis and curb the ongoing epidemic. Unfortunately, the development of such POCTs has been challenging due to the gap between researchers developing new technologies and healthcare providers using these technologies. This review aims to bridge this gap. We first present a short introduction of the four major STIs, followed by a discussion on the current landscape of commercial near-POC instruments for the detection of these STIs. We present relevant research toward addressing the gaps in developing NAAT-based STI POCT technologies and supplement this discussion with technologies for HIV and other infectious diseases, which may be adapted for STIs. Additionally, as case studies, we highlight the developmental trajectory of two different POCT technologies, including one approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Finally, we offer our perspectives on future development of NAAT-based STI POCT technologies.

Indexed as

Chlamydia InfectionsHIV InfectionsNucleic AcidsSexually Transmitted DiseasesHumansPatient CarePoint-of-Care SystemsPoint-of-Care TestingUnited StatesNucleic Acids

Identifiers

PMID35048928
PMCPMC9035340
OpenAlexW3215348331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.