Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35048877›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science2021

The ethnic density effect in psychosis: a systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis.

Sophie J Baker, Mike Jackson, Hannah Jongsma, Christopher W N Saville

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Synergistic pathways to psychosis: understanding developmental risk and resilience factors.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Urban mental health: a position paper of the European psychiatric association.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The social determinants of mental health and disorder: evidence, prevention and recommendations.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2024
    Article
  16. Stress, Environment and Early Psychosis.Current neuropharmacology · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sophie J BakerSchool of Psychology, Bangor University, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4173-1873
Mike JacksonNorth Wales Clinical Psychology Programme, School of Psychology, Bangor University; and Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bangor, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6733-9058
Hannah JongsmaCentre for Transcultural Psychiatry Veldzicht, Balkbrug; and Department of Psychiatry, University of Groningen; and University Medical Centre Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6346-5903
Christopher W N SavilleNorth Wales Clinical Psychology Programme, School of Psychology, Bangor University, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4870-7630

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn 'ethnic' or 'group' density effect in psychosis has been observed, whereby the risk of psychosis in minority group individuals is inversely related to neighbourhood-level proportions of others belonging to the same group. However, there is conflicting evidence over whether this effect differs between minority groups and limited investigation into other moderators.

aimsTo conduct a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the group density effect in psychosis and examine moderators.

methodFour databases were systematically searched. A narrative review was conducted and a three-level meta-analysis was performed. The potential moderating effect of crudely and specifically defined minority groups was assessed. Country, time, area size and whether studies used clinical or non-clinical outcomes were also tested as moderators.

resultsThirty-two studies were included in the narrative review and ten in the meta-analysis. A 10 percentage-point decrease in own-group density was associated with a 20% increase in psychosis risk (OR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.09-1.32, P < 0.001). This was moderated by crudely defined minority groups (F6,68 = 6.86, P < 0.001), with the strongest associations observed in Black populations, followed by a White Other sample. Greater heterogeneity was observed when specific minority groups were assessed (F25,49 = 7.26, P < 0.001).

conclusionsThis is the first review to provide meta-analytic evidence that the risk of psychosis posed by lower own-group density varies across minority groups, with the strongest associations observed in Black individuals. Heterogeneity in effect sizes may reflect distinctive social experiences of specific minority groups. Potential mechanisms are discussed, along with the implications of findings and suggestions for future research.

Indexed as

EthnicityPsychotic DisordersBlack PeopleHumansMinority GroupsResidence CharacteristicsEthnic densitymental health inequalityminority groupspsychosisschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID35048877
PMCPMC8636614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.