ArticleThe British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science2021
Is psychosis a syndemic manifestation of historical and contemporary adversity? Findings from UK Biobank.
Article in The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- What works for whom: a systematic review of inequalities in inclusion and effectiveness of social interventions for mental ill- health.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2026Pooled it
- Testing syndemic models along pathways to psychotic spectrum disorder: implications for population-level preventive interventions.Psychological medicine · 2025Article
- A syndemic approach to the study of Covid-19-related death: a cohort study using UK Biobank data.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Pathways, predictors and paradoxes of illbeing and wellbeing in older adults: Insights from a UK Biobank study.PLOS mental health · 2025Article
- Can social adversity and mental, physical and oral multimorbidity form a syndemic? A concept and protocol paper.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Ethnic inequality, multimorbidity and psychosis: can a syndemic framework resolve disputed evidence?Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- Work-related experiences of consultant psychiatrists during the COVID-19 response: qualitative analysis.BJPsych open · 2023Article
- Ethnic inequities in multimorbidity among people with psychosis: a retrospective cohort study.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2022Article
- Experience-based investigation and codesign of approaches to prevent and reduce Mental Health Act use (CO-PACT): a protocol.BMJ open · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPsychosis is associated with many forms of adversity, deprivation and living in urban areas.
aimsTo investigate whether psychosis is part of a syndemic of multiple adversities.
methodDrawing on UK Biobank (UKBB) data (Project ID: 57601), we sought to understand mechanisms by which childhood, recent/contemporary and place-based adversities might cluster and interact to be implicated in pathways by which psychoses evolve. We investigated the associations between adversities, potential mediating inflammatory markers and ICD-10 diagnoses (F20-F31) of psychotic disorders. We fitted logistic regression models initially including all relevant candidate variables and used backwards deletion to retain theoretically plausible and statistically significant (P < 0.05) associations with psychotic disorders. The candidate variables were entered in a partial least squares structural equation model (PLS-SEM) to test for syndemic interactions between risk factors. We tested whether the findings were sensitive to demographics, gender and ethnicity.
resultsWe fitted a PLS-SEM including psychosis as a syndemic outcome, and identified three latent constructs: lifetime adversity, current adversity and biomarkers. Factor loadings were above 0.30, and all structural paths were significant (P < 0.05). There were moderate associations between lifetime adversity and current adversity (standardised coefficient s.c. = 0.178) and between current adversity and biomarkers (s.c. = 0.227). All three latent constructs showed small but significant associations with psychosis (s.c. < 0.04). Lifetime adversity and current adversity were more strongly associated among ethnic minorities (combined) than White British people.
conclusionsOur findings stress the importance of interactions between childhood and contemporary adversities in preventive and therapeutic interventions for psychotic disorders, especially among ethnic minorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.