Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35048482›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2022

Towards online delivery of Dialectical Behaviour Therapy: A scoping review.

Richard Lakeman, Peter King, John Hurley, Richard Tranter, Andrew Leggett, Katrina Campbell, Claudia Herrera

Open access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Psychotherapies in opioid use disorder: toward a step-care model.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2024
    Review
  8. Efficacy and recommendations for the delivery of telehealth psychotherapy for people with personality disorder.Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Richard LakemanFaculty of Health, Southern Cross University, Bilinga, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4304-5431
Peter KingAustralian DBT Institute, Southport, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6989-4741
John HurleyFaculty of Health, Southern Cross University, Bilinga, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9205-2331
Richard TranterMid North Coast Local Health District, Port Macquarie Base Hospital, Port Macquarie, New South Wales, Australia.
Andrew LeggettMid North Coast Local Health District, Port Macquarie Base Hospital, Port Macquarie, New South Wales, Australia.
Katrina CampbellFaculty of Health, Southern Cross University, Bilinga, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6947-3840
Claudia HerreraAustralian DBT Institute, Southport, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3503-4617
Southern Cross University · AUPort Macquarie Base Hospital · AUTAFE Queensland Gold Coast · AU

Funding

Council of Australian University LibrariansSouthern Cross University, Faculty of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT) programmes are often the only available treatment for people diagnosed with borderline personality disorder and were rapidly converted to online delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Limited research exists surrounding how the major elements of DBT are delivered in an online environment. This scoping review considered the operationalization of online delivery of DBT and its effectiveness. EBSCO host databases were searched using free text. Of 127 papers, 11 studies from 2010 to 2021 investigating online DBT for any clinical population were included in the review. A narrative synthesis of papers selected was undertaken. Seven articles reported results from five clinical trials (n = 437). Most adaptations mirrored face-to-face programmes although there was considerable variation in how therapy was facilitated. Attendance was reported to be greater online with comparable clinical improvements to face-to-face for those who remained in therapy. Additional challenges included managing risk, therapist preparedness and technology difficulties. Online delivery of DBT programmes is feasible and may be more accessible, acceptable and as safe and effective as face-to-face delivery. However, mirroring face to face delivery in an online environment may not be the most effective and efficient way to adapt DBT to online provision. Research is needed to identify areas which require further adaptation.

Indexed as

Borderline Personality DisorderCOVID-19Dialectical Behavior TherapyBehavior TherapyHumansPandemicsTreatment Outcomeborderline personality disorderCOVID-19DBTdialectical behaviour therapytelehealth

Identifiers

PMID35048482
PMCPMC9305106
OpenAlexW4205827048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.