Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35048469›Full record

ReviewRespirology (Carlton, Vic.)2022

COVID-19 infection and the broader impacts of the pandemic on healthcare workers.

Natasha Smallwood, Warren Harrex, Megan Rees, Karen Willis, Catherine M Bennett

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Respirology (Carlton, Vic.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
20.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Association of Moral Injury and Healthcare Clinicians' Wellbeing: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. 'I Want People to Know out There, Just How Many Caregivers Struggle Between Work and Home': Feminist Intersectional Research Exploring Caregiving Lived Experiences in New Zealand.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Natasha SmallwoodDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3403-3586
Warren HarrexConsultant Occupational & Environmental Physician, Woden, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Megan ReesDepartment of Respiratory and Sleep Disorders Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7736-4000
Karen WillisPublic Health, College of Health and Biomedicine, Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8036-8814
Catherine M BennettInstitute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9581-1612
The Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUDeakin University · AUIP Australia · AUThe Alfred Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) disease or COVID-19 pandemic is associated with more than 230 million cases and has challenged healthcare systems globally. Many healthcare workers (HCWs) have acquired the infection, often through their workplace, with a significant number dying. The epidemiology of COVID-19 infection in HCWs continues to be explored, with manifold exposure risks identified, leading to COVID-19 being recognised as an occupational disease for HCWs. The physical illness due to COVID-19 in HCWs is similar to the general population, with some HCWs experiencing a long-term illness, which may impact their ability to return to work. HCWs have also been affected by the immense workplace and psychosocial disruption caused by the pandemic. The impacts on the psychological well-being of HCWs globally have been profound, with high prevalence estimates for mental health symptoms, including emotional exhaustion. Globally, governments, healthcare organisations and employers have key responsibilities, including: to be better prepared for crises with comprehensive disaster response management plans, and to protect and preserve the health workforce from the physical and psychological impacts of the pandemic. While prioritising HCWs in vaccine rollouts globally has been critical, managing exposures and outbreaks occurring in healthcare settings remains challenging and continues to lead to substantial disruption to the health workforce. Safeguarding healthcare workforces during crises is critical as we move forward on the new path of 'COVID normal'.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsHealth PersonnelHumansMental HealthSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 infectionepidemiologyhealthcare workersmentaloccupational medicine

Identifiers

PMID35048469
OpenAlexW4206750687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.