ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2022
Lessons from a quarter century of being human in protein science.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lessons from a quarter century of being human in protein science.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past quarter century, my engagement with the protein society has allowed me to witness first-hand the evolution of our deepening understanding of the complexity of protein folding landscapes. During my own evolution as a protein scientist, my passion for protein folding has deepened into an obsession with mapping and decoding the thermodynamic and kinetic secrets of protein landscapes-especially those of rebel proteins, whose "nontraditional" behavior has challenged our paradigms and inspired the expansion of our models and methods. It is perhaps not surprising that I see parallels in the evolution of the landscape framework and in the development of our own trajectories as humans in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM). Just as with proteins, however, we need to recognize that our individual human landscapes are not isolated from our local departmental and institutional communities, and are integrated into the larger networks of our STEM disciplines, academia, industry, and/or government, not to mention society. My experience with hundreds of participants in the Being Human in STEM (HSTEM) initiative that Amherst College undergraduates and I co-founded in 2016 has helped me find hope for STEM and humanity. If we commit to reconciling our identities as scientists with our responsibilities as human beings, together we can accelerate the evolution of individual, community, and societal landscapes to contribute to addressing the dire challenges facing our planet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.