Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35048300›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2022

Non-pharmacological Treatment for Chronic Pain in US Veterans Treated Within the Veterans Health Administration: Implications for Expansion in US Healthcare Systems.

Zachary L Mannes, Malki Stohl, David S Fink, Mark Olfson, Katherine M Keyes, Silvia S Martins, Jaimie L Gradus, Andrew J Saxon, Charles Maynard, Ofir Livne and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Zachary L MannesDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Malki StohlNew York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, Box 123, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
David S FinkNew York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, Box 123, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Mark OlfsonDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Katherine M KeyesDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Silvia S MartinsDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Jaimie L GradusDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Andrew J SaxonDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Charles MaynardDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ofir LivneDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Sarah GutkindDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Deborah S HasinDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA. dsh2@cumc.columbia.edu.
Columbia University · USNew York State Psychiatric InstituteUniversity of Washington · USBoston University · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

Substance Abuse Epidemiology Training Program (SAETP) at Columbia UniversityT32DA031099 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DEBORAH S HASIN, Silvia Saboia Martins · 2012 to 2026
$6.1M
Impact of Medical and Recreational Marijuana Laws On Cannabis, Opioids And Psychiatric Medications: National Study of VA Patients, 2000 - 2024R01DA048860 · NIDA · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI HASIN, DEBORAH S · 2019 to 2023
$4.1M
NIDA NIH HHS 5T32DA031099NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA048860NIDA NIH HHS R01DA048860NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA031099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConsensus guidelines recommend multimodal chronic pain treatment with increased use of non-pharmacological treatment modalities (NPM), including as first-line therapies. However, with many barriers to NPM uptake in US healthcare systems, NPM use may vary across medical care settings. Military veterans are disproportionately affected by chronic pain. Many veterans receive treatment through the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), an integrated healthcare system in which specific policies promote NPM use.

objectiveTo examine whether veterans with chronic pain who utilize VHA healthcare were more likely to use NPM than veterans who do not utilize VHA healthcare.

designCross-sectional nationally representative study.

participantsUS military veterans (N = 2,836). MAIN MEASURES: In the 2019 National Health Interview Survey, veterans were assessed for VHA treatment, chronic pain (i.e., past 3-month daily or almost daily pain), symptoms of depression and anxiety, substance use, and NPM (i.e., physical therapy, chiropractic/spinal manipulation, massage, psychotherapy, educational class/workshop, peer support groups, or yoga/tai chi). KEY

resultsChronic pain (45.2% vs. 26.8%) and NPM use (49.8% vs. 39.4%) were more prevalent among VHA patients than non-VHA veterans. After adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, psychiatric symptoms, physical health indicators, and use of cigarettes or prescription opioids, VHA patients were more likely than non-VHA veterans to use any NPM (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.07-2.16) and multimodal NPM (aOR = 1.80, 95% CI: 1.12-2.87) than no NPM. Among veterans with chronic pain, VHA patients were more likely to use chiropractic care (aOR = 1.90, 95% CI = 1.12-3.22), educational class/workshop (aOR = 3.02, 95% CI = 1.35-6.73), or psychotherapy (aOR = 4.28, 95% CI = 1.69-10.87).

conclusionsAmong veterans with chronic pain, past-year VHA use was associated with greater likelihood of receiving NPM. These findings may suggest that the VHA is an important resource and possible facilitator of NPM. VHA policies may offer guidance for expanding use of NPM in other integrated US healthcare systems.

Indexed as

Chronic PainDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedVeteransCross-Sectional StudiesHumansUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsVeterans Healthchronic painmilitary veteransnon-pharmacological pain treatmentprescription opioid useVeterans Health Administration

Identifiers

PMID35048300
PMCPMC8769678
OpenAlexW4205441938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.