SynthesisNeurosurgical review2022
The outcome of microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of botulinum neurotoxin in the treatment of hemifacial spasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Article
- An analysis of postoperative outcomes of bilateral water sign and facial spasm after decompression: A retrospective study.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Factors Affecting Surgical Complexity of Microvascular Decompression for Hemifacial Spasm.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2025Article
- Determining prognostic factors in the treatment of primary hemifacial spasm: Clinical outcomes and complications. A literature review.World neurosurgery: X · 2025Article
- Botulinum toxin type A injections demonstrate remarkable efficacy in treating hemifacial spasm in elderly patients.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Radiofrequency thermocoagulation as a treatment for hemifacial spasm: long-term follow-up and management of recurrences.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Article
- Bridge-layered decompression technique for vertebral artery-involved hemifacial spasm: technical note.BMC surgery · 2024Article
- Fully endoscopic microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: a clinical study and analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2024Article
- Autologous bone fragments for skull reconstruction after microvascular decompression.BMC surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Microvascular decompression (MVD) is the first choice of surgery for hemifacial spasm (HFS). MVD surgery for vertebral artery (VA)-associated HFS is more difficult than for non-VA-associated HFS. There is controversy about the cure rate and complication of MVD for HFS in previous studies. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase for relevant publications. Based on the search results, we compared the outcomes of MVD for VA-associated HFS and non-VA-associated HFS. At the same time, we analyzed spasm-free rates and the complications and assessed the relationship between VA-associated HFS and gender, left side, and age. For analysis, six studies that included 2952 patients in the VA-associated group and 604 in the non-VA-associated group were selected. The effective rate of MVD was not significantly different between both groups (OR = 1.16, 95% CI 0.81-1.67, P = 0.42). Compared to non-VA-associated group, the transient complications (OR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.46-0.89, P = 0.008) and permanent complications (OR = 0.28, 95% CI 0.15-0.54, P = 0.0001) occurred more frequently in VA-associated group. The rate of hearing loss was significantly higher in VA-associated HFS than non-VA-associated HFS (OR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.19-0.64, P = 0.0007); the facial paralysis after operation was not significantly different between both groups (OR = 1.25, 95% CI 0.91-1.72, P = 0.17). There were older patients (WMD = 3.67, 95% CI 3.29-4.05, P < 0.00001) and more left-sided HFS (OR = 0.23, 95% CI 0.19 - 0.29, P < 0.0002) in the VA-associated HFS group than non-VA-associated HFS group, while the non-VA-associated HFS group was female-dominated (OR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.32 - 1.89, P < 0.00001). Both groups achieved good results in MVD cure rates. In VA-associated HFS, the complication rate of decompression and the rate of hearing loss after operation were higher than in non-VA-associated HFS, but the facial paralysis after operation was similar in both groups, and most complications were transient and disappeared during follow-up. VA-associated HFS is more prevalent in older adults, less prevalent in women, and more predominantly left-sided. More clinical studies are needed to better compare the efficacy and complication of MVD between both groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.