Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35048240›Full record

Trial reportChinese journal of integrative medicine2022

Efficacy and Safety of Mulberry Twig Alkaloids Tablet for Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Multicenter Clinical Study.

Ling Qu, Xiao-Chun Liang, Guo-Qing Tian, Gai-Li Zhang, Qun-Li Wu, Xiu-Mei Huang, Ya-Zhong Cui, Yu-Ling Liu, Zhu-Fang Shen, Guo-Qing Ma and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Chinese journal of integrative medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Ling QuDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Xiao-Chun LiangDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China. Xiaochun_Liang@yeah.net.
Guo-Qing TianDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Gai-Li ZhangDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Qun-Li WuDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Xiu-Mei HuangDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Ya-Zhong CuiDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Yu-Ling LiuInstitute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100050, China.
Zhu-Fang ShenInstitute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100050, China.
Guo-Qing MaDepartment of Endocrinology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Haerbin, 150001, China.
Hao LuDepartment of Endocrinology, Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 201203, China.
Yi LiDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, 10005, China.
Hong JiangDepartment of Endocrinology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, 110034, China.
Xi-Yan YangDepartment of Geriatrics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Tianjin University of Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 300073, China.
Guang-de ZhangDepartment of Endocrinology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100091, China.
Chen-Hua YangDepartment of Endocrinology, Affiliated Hospital of Henan Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, 450003, China.
Peking Union Medical College Hospital · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNBeijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNHeilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine · CNLiaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNShuguang Hospital · CNTianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNXiyuan Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of mulberry twig alkaloids (Sangzhi alkaloids, SZ-A) for treatment of type 2 diabetes in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter clinical trial.

methodsA total of 200 patients were randomized to receive SZ-A (n=100) or placebo (n=100) for 16 weeks. The data analysis system for electronic data capture clinical trial central randomization system was used for randomization and dispensing of drugs. The primary outcome was the change in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level. The secondary outcome included the proportions of cases with HbA1c <7.0% and HbA1c <6.5%, fasting blood glucose (FBG), postprandial blood glucose (PBG), area under curve for the PBG (AUC

resultsCompared with baseline, the change of HbA1c at week 16 was -0.80% (95% CI: -0.98% to -0.62%) and -0.09% (95% CI: -0.27% to 0.09%) in SZ-A group and placebo group, respectively. The proportion of patients with HbA1c <7% and <6.5% was higher in the SZ-A group than in the placebo group (46.8% vs. 21.6% and 29.9% vs. 10.8%). The observed values and changes in FBG, 1 h-PBG, 2 h-PBG, and AUC

conclusionSZ-A are effective and safe for treatment of type 2 diabetes. The protocol was registered in http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=60117 (ChiCTR2000038550).

Indexed as

AlkaloidsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2MorusBlood GlucoseDouble-Blind MethodGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsTabletsTreatment OutcomeAlkaloidsBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsTabletsefficacymulberry twig alkaloids tablets (Sangzhi alkaloids)placebosafetytype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID35048240
OpenAlexW4205623367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.