ArticleOdontology2022
Experimental study on the biocompatibility and osteogenesis induction ability of PLLA/DDM scaffolds.
Article in Odontology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Innovative "Tooth-On-Chip" Microfluidic Device Emulating the Structure and Physiology of the Dental Pulp Tissue.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Biomineralization-inspired mineralized hydrogel promotes the repair and regeneration of dentin/bone hard tissue.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the characterization and function of a novel porous osteogenic material (PLLA / DDM) containing polylactic acid and demineralized dentin matrix. The surface morphology and composition of the material were observed by SEM and EDS. The physical characteristics of the material were detected by roughness and water contact angle analyses. The rate of weight loss and change in the pH value of the material were observed by scaffold degradation experiments. Four types of material were investigated: polylactic acid (PLLA) scaffold, demineralized dentin matrix (DDM) particles, PLLA/DDM scaffold and a blank control. The osteogenic effect and osteogenic characteristics of the new materials were explored through in vivo and in vitro osteogenic experiments. SEM analysis showed that DDM powder was uniformly distributed in the polylactic acid scaffold, and the water contact angle revealed that the water absorption of the porous scaffold was improved after the addition of DDM powder. The EDS results showed that the peak values of calcium and phosphorus were obviously increased after the addition of DDM powder, and the porosity test showed that the scaffold had higher porosity after the addition of DDM powder. Scaffold degradation experiments revealed that the scaffold gradually degraded with increasing time, and its pH value slightly increased. The results of cell culture and animal model experiments showed that the porous PLLA/DDM scaffold had good bio-compatibility and promoted cell proliferation and differentiation. In histological and micro-CT evaluations, the material showed good bio-compatibility, biodegradability and bone conductivity with host bone tissue in vivo. PLLA / DDM hybrid showed better performance than PLLA or DDM. The biocompatibility and cell growth promoting properties were stronger than those of single material.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35048230What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.