Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35047971›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medical technology2021

Local Delivery and Glioblastoma: Why Not Combining Sustained Release and Targeting?

Claire Gazaille, Marion Sicot, Patrick Saulnier, Joël Eyer, Guillaume Bastiat

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medical technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Biodegradable nanofibrous scaffolds enhance standard of care for glioblastoma via localized targeted therapy.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Nanotherapy of Glioblastoma-Where Hope Grows.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Claire GazailleUniv Angers, Inserm, CNRS, MINT, SFR ICAT, Angers, France.
Marion SicotUniv Angers, Inserm, CNRS, MINT, SFR ICAT, Angers, France.
Patrick SaulnierUniv Angers, Inserm, CNRS, MINT, SFR ICAT, Angers, France.
Joël EyerUniv Angers, Inserm, CNRS, MINT, SFR ICAT, Angers, France.
Guillaume BastiatUniv Angers, Inserm, CNRS, MINT, SFR ICAT, Angers, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité d'Angers · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma is one of the most aggressive brain tumors and is associated with a very low overall median survival despite the current treatment. The standard of care used in clinic is the Stupp's protocol which consists of a maximal resection of the tumor when possible, followed by radio and chemotherapy using temozolomide. However, in most cases, glioblastoma cells infiltrate healthy tissues and lead to fatal recurrences. There are a lot of hurdles to overcome in the development of new therapeutic strategies such as tumor heterogeneity, cell infiltration, alkylating agent resistance, physiological barriers, etc., and few treatments are on the market today. One of them is particularly appealing because it is a local therapy, which does not bring additional invasiveness since tumor resection is included in the gold standard treatment. They are implants: the Gliadel

Indexed as

Gliadel® wafersglioblastomalocal deliverynanoparticle-loaded hydrogeltargeting

Identifiers

PMID35047971
PMCPMC8757870
OpenAlexW3216105946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.