Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35047953›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medical technology2021

Application of

Miljan Milosevic, Milos Anic, Dalibor Nikolic, Vladimir Geroski, Bogdan Milicevic, Milos Kojic, Nenad Filipovic

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medical technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. InSilc Computational Tool forComputational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Miljan MilosevicBioengineering Research and Development Center, BioIRC, Kragujevac, Serbia.
Milos AnicBioengineering Research and Development Center, BioIRC, Kragujevac, Serbia.
Dalibor NikolicBioengineering Research and Development Center, BioIRC, Kragujevac, Serbia.
Vladimir GeroskiBioengineering Research and Development Center, BioIRC, Kragujevac, Serbia.
Bogdan MilicevicBioengineering Research and Development Center, BioIRC, Kragujevac, Serbia.
Milos KojicBioengineering Research and Development Center, BioIRC, Kragujevac, Serbia.
Nenad FilipovicBioengineering Research and Development Center, BioIRC, Kragujevac, Serbia.
University of Kragujevac · RSHouston Methodist · USMetropolitan University · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS), made either from polymers or from metals, are promising materials for treating coronary artery disease through the processes of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Despite the opinion that bioresorbable polymers are more promising for coronary stents, their long-term advantages over metallic alloys have not yet been demonstrated. The development of new polymer-based BVS or optimization of the existing ones requires engineers to perform many very expensive mechanical tests to identify optimal structural geometry and material characteristics.

Indexed as

bioresorbable PLLA stentdesign and optimizationfinite element analysisin vitro mechanical testvascular scaffold

Identifiers

PMID35047953
PMCPMC8757700
OpenAlexW3206537594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.