ArticleFrontiers in medical technology2021
Evaluation and Verification of Fast Computational Simulations of Stent-Graft Deployment in Endovascular Aneurysmal Repair.
Article in Frontiers in medical technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Repair, also known as FEVAR, is a minimally invasive procedure that allows surgeons to repair the aorta while still preserving blood flow to kidneys and other critical organs. Given the high complexity of FEVAR, there is a pressing need to develop numerical tools that can assist practitioners at the preoperative planning stage and during the intervention. The aim of the present study is to introduce and to assess an assistance solution named Fast Method for Virtual Stent-graft Deployment for computer assisted FEVAR. This solution, which relies on virtual reality, is based on a single intraoperative X-ray image. It is a hybrid method that includes the use of intraoperative images and a simplified mechanical model based on corotational beam elements. The method was verified on a phantom and validated on three clinical cases, including a case with fenestrations. More specifically, we quantified the errors induced by the different simplifications of the mechanical model, related to fabric simulation and aortic wall mechanical properties. Overall, all errors for both stent and fenestration positioning were less than 5 mm, making this method compatible with clinical expectations. More specifically, the errors related to fenestration positioning were less than 3 mm. Although requiring further validation with a higher number of test cases, our method could achieve an accuracy compatible with clinical specifications within limited calculation time, which is promising for future implementation in a clinical context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.