ReviewFrontiers in medical technology2021
Antibiotic Potential and Biophysical Characterization of Amphipathic β-Stranded [XZ]
Review in Frontiers in medical technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antibacterial peptides from black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae: mode of action and characterization.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Total synthesis of [β-HIle]RSC advances · 2024Article
- 1,3,5-Triazine as Branching Connector for the Construction of Novel Antimicrobial Peptide Dendrimers: Synthesis and Biological Characterization.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Synthesis of a Cyclooctapeptide, Cyclopurpuracin, and Evaluation of Its Antimicrobial Activity.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cationic membrane-active peptides are considered to be promising candidates for antibiotic treatment. Many natural and artificial sequences show an antimicrobial activity when they are able to take on an amphipathic fold upon membrane binding, which in turn perturbs the integrity of the lipid bilayer. Most known structures are α-helices and β-hairpins, but also cyclic knots and other irregular conformations are known. Linear β-stranded antimicrobial peptides are not so common in nature, but numerous model sequences have been designed. Interestingly, many of them tend to be highly membranolytic, but also have a significant tendency to self-assemble into β-sheets by hydrogen-bonding. In this minireview we examine the literature on such amphipathic peptides consisting of simple repetitive sequences of alternating cationic and hydrophobic residues, and discuss their advantages and disadvantages. Their interactions with lipids have been characterized with a number of biophysical techniques-especially circular dichroism, fluorescence, and infrared-in order to determine their secondary structure, membrane binding, aggregation tendency, and ability to permeabilize vesicles. Their activities against bacteria, biofilms, erythrocytes, and human cells have also been studied using biological assays. In line with the main scope of this Special Issue, we attempt to correlate the biophysical results with the biological data, and in particular we discuss which properties (length, charge, aggregation tendency, etc.) of these simple model peptides are most relevant for their biological function. The overview presented here offers ideas for future experiments, and also suggests a few design rules for promising β-stranded peptides to develop efficient antimicrobial agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.