Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35047891›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medical technology2020

In-cell Solid-State NMR Studies of Antimicrobial Peptides.

Frances Separovic, David W Keizer, Marc-Antoine Sani

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medical technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Solid-state NMR of membrane proteins in situ.Current opinion in structural biology · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. In-cellBiophysical chemistry · 2023
    Article
  5. Probing Cell-Surface Interactions in Fungal Cell Walls by High-ResolutionChemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Antimicrobial Peptide Mechanisms Studied by Whole-Cell Deuterium NMR.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Frances SeparovicSchool of Chemistry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
David W KeizerBio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Marc-Antoine SaniSchool of Chemistry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) have attracted attention as alternatives to classic antibiotics due to their expected limited pressure on bacterial resistance mechanisms. Yet, their modes of action, in particular

Indexed as

antimicrobial peptidesbacteriain-cell NMRmode of actionsolid-state NMR

Identifiers

PMID35047891
PMCPMC8757805
OpenAlexW3112393012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.