Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35047795›Full record

ArticleBMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies2020

Feasibility of in-office MRI-targeted partial gland cryoablation for prostate cancer: an IDEAL stage 2A study.

Spyridon P Basourakos, Bashir Al Hussein Al Awamlh, Fernando J Bianco, Neal A Patel, Aaron Laviana, Daniel J Margolis, Juan M Mosquera, Timothy D McClure, Miko Yu, Jim C Hu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. MR Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Biopsy and Primary Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Spyridon P Basourakos *Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7458-4593
Bashir Al Hussein Al Awamlh *Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Fernando J BiancoUrology, Urological Research Network, Miami Lakes, Florida, USA.
Neal A PatelUrology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Aaron LavianaUrology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Daniel J MargolisRadiology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Juan M MosqueraPathology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Timothy D McClureUrology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Miko YuUrology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Jim C HuUrology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2562-8024
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USResearch Network (United States) · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCryoablation for prostate cancer is typically performed under general anaesthesia. We explore the safety, feasibility and costs of in-office MRI-targeted prostate partial gland cryoablation (PGC) under local anaesthesia. We hypothesise that an office-based procedure under local anaesthesia may yield greater patient convenience and lower health costs with similar outcomes to a general anaesthesia approach. DESIGN/PARTICIPANTS/SETTING/

interventionsRetrospective study of men diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer (grade group (GG) ≥2) who elected to undergo in-office PGC under local anaesthesia.

main outcome measuresA total of 55 men with GG ≥2 prostate cancer underwent PGC under local anaesthesia, and 35 of 43 men (81.4%) who attained ≥6 months of follow-up post-treatment underwent MRI-targeted surveillance biopsy. We used MRI findings and targeted biopsy to characterise post-PGC oncological outcomes. Complications were categorised using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Expanded Prostate Cancer Index-Clinical Practice was used to characterise urinary and sexual function scores at baseline, 4 and 9 months post-PGC. Time-driven activity-based costing was used to determine healthcare costs of in-office PGC.

resultsFive (9.1%) men experienced CTCAE score 3 adverse events. Urinary and sexual function did not change significantly from baseline to 4 months (p=0.20 and p=0.08, respectively) and 9 months (p=0.23 and p=0.67, respectively). Twenty-two men (62.9%) had no cancer or GG1 and 13 (37.1%) men had GG≥2 on post-PGC biopsy. Moreover, the median cost of in-office PGC was US$4,463.05 (range US$4,087.19-US7,238.16) with disposables comprising 69% of the cost.

conclusionsIn-office PGC is feasible under local anaesthesia with favourable functional outcome preservation and adverse events profile at significantly lower costs compared with a general anaesthesia approach.

Indexed as

devicesexploration studyoutcomes researchurology devices

Identifiers

PMID35047795
PMCPMC8749259
OpenAlexW3100831486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.