Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35047788›Full record

ArticleBMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies2020

Usability assessment of Versius, a new robot-assisted surgical device for use in minimal access surgery.

Fiona Haig, Ana Cristina Barbosa Medeiros, Karen Chitty, Mark Slack

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06362070 (Comparison of Outcomes of Multiple Platforms for Assisted Robotic - Gastrectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06362070 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Outcomes of Multiple Platforms for Assisted Robotic - Gastrectomy (COMPAR-G) in Gastric Cancer Patient.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata VeronaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled75ConditionsGastric Cancer, Gastrointestinal Cancer, Neoplasms, Gastric Diffuse AdenocarcinomaArmsDaVinci® Surgical System, Hugo™ RAS System, Versius® Robotic Surgery System
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. European Society of Coloproctology guideline on training in robotic colorectal surgery (2024).Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2024
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Da VinciSurgical endoscopy · 2026
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Usability of an independent arm modular robotic system in abdominal wall surgery: supraumbilical midline closure.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Prospective development study of the Versius Surgical System for use in transoral robotic surgery: an IDEAL stage 1/2a first in human and initial case series experience.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fiona HaigCMR Surgical, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Ana Cristina Barbosa MedeirosCMR Surgical, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Karen ChittyCMR Surgical, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Mark SlackCMR Surgical, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2176-8118
CMR Surgical (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesVersius is a teleoperated surgical robotic system intended for use in minimal access surgery. This study aimed to validate the safety and effectiveness of the Versius user interface in the hands of trained users and identify and address the causes of any user errors.

designSurgical teams completed a commercially representative training program over 3.5 days. After training was completed, the usability-related aspects of the system were assessed.

settingA simulated operating room using a cadaveric model.

participantsSurgical teams consisting of a lead surgeon, assistant surgeon, scrub nurse and circulating nurse.

main outcome measuresUsability-related aspects of the system were assessed through the completion of critical and non-critical tasks. A critical task was defined according to the Food and Drug Administration's definition, as a user task which, if performed incorrectly or not performed at all, would or could cause serious harm to the patient or user, where harm is defined to include compromised medical care.

resultsIn total, 17 surgical teams participated in the study and all were experienced in laparoscopic surgery. The number of robotic surgeries performed by the participants per month ranged from 0 to 100. Surgical specialties were similarly represented from obstetrics and gynecology, colorectal, urology and upper gastrointestinal. No critical task failures were observed. Of all the tasks completed, 98% were recorded as a pass or a pass with difficulty.

conclusionsThese results demonstrate that in a simulated clinical setting, Versius can be safely used by both laparoscopically and robotically trained healthcare professionals. These results support the progression to assessment of Versius in preclinical studies.

Indexed as

minimally invasive surgical proceduresrobotic surgical procedures

Identifiers

PMID35047788
PMCPMC8749256
OpenAlexW3026562164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.